Traduction de «ICC's decision » (Anglais → Français) :

Indian Claims Commission's decision [ ICC's decision | decision of the Indian Claims Commission | decision of the ICC ]

legal counsel of the Indian Claims Commission [ legal counsel of the ICC | ICC's legal counsel ]

to reverse one's first decision | to revoke one's decision

Band Council's decision [ decision of the Band Council ]

decision (EU) [ Commission Decision | Community decision | Council Decision | decision of the European Central Bank | decision of the European Council | decision of the European Parliament | European Council decision ]

Council Decision on own resources | Council Decision on the system of own resources of the European Union | Council Decision on the system of the European Communities' own resources | Own Resources Decision

implementing decision [ Commission implementing decision | Council implementing decision ]

criminal decision | criminal law decision | decision in criminal matters

clearance decision | clearance of accounts decision | decisions on clearance of accounts

The Prosecution appealed the ICC's decision; hearings were held in October 2014 and a decision is pending as of December 2014.

While this level of confidentiality may be appropriate in commercial arbitrations, it precludes public scrutiny of ICC arbitrations involving states and makes it difficult to evaluate the policy implications of a state's decision to authorize investment arbitration under the ICC Rules.

(Return tabled) Question No. 1306 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the crisis in Syria: (a) what criteria does the government use to determine (i) whether to intervene, (ii) when to intervene, (iii) the nature and scope of any intervention; (b) who makes the determination in (a) and how; (c) what sources does the government rely upon in determining (a); (d) what legal obligations are considered with respect to (a) and in what ways does the Responsibility to Protect doctrine factor into decision making under (a); (e) in what ways has the government evaluated its obligations under the Responsibility to Protect doctrine with respect to ...[+++] Syria; (f) when were such evaluations done, by whom, and with what outcome; (g) have the criteria by which the government determines its official policy towards the crisis in Syria changed since 2012; (h) when the Minister of Foreign Affairs publicly expressed his support for an indictment of Bashar al-Assad by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2012, was this the position of the government and does it remain the position of the government that al-Assad ought to be indicted by the ICC; (j) with respect to Canada’s decision not to sign on to the request of 57 countries made in January, 2013, to ask the Security Council to refer the situation in Syria to the ICC, did Canada support this request; (k) with respect to (j), when, why, how, and by whom were the determinations made in this regard, and when was Canada approached to join in this endeavor and by what means; (l) what criteria were applied in determining whether to support this effort; (m) are there any specific policies or directives within the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade that guide decision-making with regard to Canadian intervention in situations of humanitarian crisis; (n) was the decision not to sign the Swiss-led letter asking the United Nations Security Council to refer the situation in Syria to the ICC made by the Minister of Fore ...

The objective of the Council decision is to advance universal support for the Rome Statute by promoting the widest possible participation in it, to preserve the integrity of the Statute, to support the independence of the ICC and its effective and efficient functioning and to support cooperation with the ICC.