Traduction de «Refusal asylum application » (Anglais → Français) :

K. whereas Article 29 of Directive 2005/85/EC provides for the drawing-up of a minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin, and whereas it is unfortunate on the one hand that this list has still not been drawn up and on the other hand that the Council did not take into account Parliament's opinion when adopting that Directive, for which reason an action for annulment of Directive 2005/85/CE is now pending before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (the Court of Justice); whereas such a list, which should be adopted under the codecision procedure, would clearly be a key factor in the introduction of a common asylum system an ...[+++]d in prompt status decisions; whereas the inclusion of a country on that list does not mean automatically that asylum seekers from that country will be basically refused asylum, but rather that, according to the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the status of refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (Geneva Convention), there is an individual assessment of every single application,

L. whereas Article 29 of Directive 2005/85/EC provides for the drawing-up of a minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin, and noting that on the one hand this list has still not been drawn up and on the other hand that the Council did not take into account Parliament's opinion when adopting that Directive, for which reason an action for annulment of Directive 2005/85/CE is now pending before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (the Court of Justice); whereas such a list should be adopted under the codecision procedure; whereas the inclusion of a country on that list does not mean automatically that asylum seekers f ...[+++]rom that country will be basically refused asylum, but rather that, according to the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (Geneva Convention), there is an individual assessment of every single application,

(e) to enhance cooperation in the field of the return of nationals of third countries and stateless persons without residence permits and refused asylum applicants, including transit through other Member States and third countries.

(e) to enhance co-operation in the field of the return of nationals of third countries and stateless persons without residence permits, and refused asylum applicants, including transit through other Member States and third countries.

The danger highlighted by the HCR is that those states most capable of taking responsibility for examining asylum requests may further restrict access to their territory and their procedures. This is illustrated by the aforementioned recent extremely restrictive laws. The UNHCR is also concerned, in connection with the fight against terrorism, at the risk of excessive use of the clause ruling out the right of asylum for applicants who have committed serious offences or crimes prior to their arrival in the host country (Article 1(F) of the Convention). The High Commissioner's office considers the accelerated procedures to be inadequate in ...[+++] such cases since they do not leave any possibility of checking the serious nature of the offence or assessing the relationship between the offence and the consequences of exclusion for the asylum seeker. In ECRE's view, even membership of a terrorist network is not, in itself, sufficient reason to refuse an application for asylum.

It is irresponsible to throw ourselves headlong into this matter and refuse to resolve the real problems by making third-country nationals carry the can. No, Mr Hernández Mollar, Europe’s problem is that of unemployment and exclusion, not that of third-country nationals and asylum applicants.