Traduction de «The mutual obligations the parties » (Anglais → Français) :

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

Protocol adjusting the trade aspects of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, acting within the framework of the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Slovenia, of the other part, to take account of the outcome of negotiations between the parties on new mutual agricultural concessions

Protocol adjusting the trade aspects of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Poland, of the other part, to take account of the outcome of negotiations between the Parties on new mutual agricultural concessions

Treaty on the Mutual Non-Use of Military Force and the Maintenance of Peaceful Relations Between the States Parties to the Warsaw Treaty and the States Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Political Consultative Committee of the States Parties to the Treaty of Friendship, Co-operation and Mutual Assistance

Committee of Ministers for Foreign Affairs of the States Parties to the Treaty of Friendship, Co-operation and Mutual Assistance

With the Parties not yet being able to reach a permanent settlement terminating the WTO dispute envisaged in Phase III of the MoU, the Memorandum has expired on 1 August 2013, with the mutual obligations remaining in place until 1 February 2014.

99. Emphasises the need for human rights in Western Sahara and in the Tindouf camps to be addressed, even without anticipating any final political settlement or expressing a view on such a settlement; reiterates, nevertheless, that self-determination is a fundamental human right, as specified by Article 1 of the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and that territorial integrity is a principle enshrined in international law; recalls, moreover, UN Security Council Resolution 1754(2007), urging the parties to enter into negotiations in good faith, without preconditions, ‘with a view to achieving a just, la ...[+++]sting and mutually acceptable political solution, which would provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara; echoes this call to Morocco and the Polisario Front to continue negotiations for a peaceful solution to the conflict, reaffirming the rights of the Sahrawi people to self-determination; stresses the opportunity deriving from the political and democratic reforms undertaken in Morocco, while taking note of the stronger obligations necessitated by these reforms to respect and uphold human rights in Western Sahara in particular; fears that the 25-year delay in arranging a referendum, or reaching any other form of mutually acceptable negotiated political settlement, is increasing Sahrawi alienation and the potential for violence, particularly amongst the young; calls on the EU to become more closely involved and to support the United Nations in its efforts to encourage the parties to resume direct negotiations with a view to securing a peaceful and lasting resolution of the conflict;

102. Emphasises the need for human rights in Western Sahara and in the Tindouf camps to be addressed, even without anticipating any final political settlement or expressing a view on such a settlement; reiterates, nevertheless, that self-determination is a fundamental human right, as specified by Article 1 of the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and that territorial integrity is a principle enshrined in international law; recalls, moreover, UN Security Council Resolution 1754(2007), urging the parties to enter into negotiations in good faith, without preconditions, ‘with a view to achieving a just, la ...[+++]sting and mutually acceptable political solution, which would provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara; echoes this call to Morocco and the Polisario Front to continue negotiations for a peaceful solution to the conflict, reaffirming the rights of the Sahrawi people to self-determination; stresses the opportunity deriving from the political and democratic reforms undertaken in Morocco, while taking note of the stronger obligations necessitated by these reforms to respect and uphold human rights in Western Sahara in particular; fears that the 25-year delay in arranging a referendum, or reaching any other form of mutually acceptable negotiated political settlement, is increasing Sahrawi alienation and the potential for violence, particularly amongst the young; calls on the EU to become more closely involved and to support the United Nations in its efforts to encourage the parties to resume direct negotiations with a view to securing a peaceful and lasting resolution of the conflict;

4. Welcomes the increased attention to human rights in EU policy; notes that the UN has developed a comprehensive strategy on the Sahel with a strong human rights dimension; recalls that the EU and the countries of the Sahel, as signatories to the Cotonou Agreement, have assumed mutual obligations to protect human rights and democratic principles, based on the rule of law and transparent and accountable governance; points out that the Sahel states are parties to most international treaties for the protection of human rights, women’ ...[+++]s rights and the rights of the child;