Traduction de «Toponymy and Terminology Committee Parks Canada » (Anglais → Français) :

Toponymy and Terminology Committee of Parks Canada

Toponymy and Terminology used by Parks Canada

Terminology Used by Parks Canada

Question No. 654 Hon. John McKay: With regard to the proposed Rouge National Urban Park (RNUP): (a) how does the RNUP legislation and strategic plan incorporate the ecological integrity, water quality and quantity, and habitat restoration goals and priorities of (i) the Provincial Greenbelt Plan, (ii) the Rouge North Management Plan Section 4.1.1.2, (iii) the 2007 Rouge River Watershed Strategy and its targeted natural heritage system, (iv) the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan (2007), (v) the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Action Plan (2008), (vi) the Toronto Great Lakes Area of Concern remedial action plan for Toronto, (vii) the federal report “How Much Habitat is Enough” and the recommendation of more than 30% forest cover and 10% wetla ...[+++]nd cover per watershed, (viii) the National Parks Act, (ix) the Ontario Provincial Parks Act, (x) the draft Rouge River Watershed Fisheries Management Plan (2011), (xi) the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, (xii) the Endangered Species Act, (xiii) other relevant provincial, municipal and federal legislation; (b) how has the government addressed the issues raised in the unanimous November 2012 City of Toronto Motion on RNUP; (c) why has the promised RNUP “Transition Advisory Committee” not been created, (i) what is the updated timetable for the creation of this committee, (ii) what individuals or entities will comprise the advisory committee, (iii) what mandate will the advisory committee be given; (d) what steps have Environment Canada, Parks Canada and the government taken to assess the water quality, biodiversity, migratory fisheries, climatic, flood and erosion control, public health and ecological service benefits of restoring the majority of the public lands in Rouge Park to forest, wetland and meadow vegetation; (e) will the federally-owned and provincially-designated Greenbelt “Natural Heritage System” and Oak Ridges Moraine lands in north Pickering be included as part of the RNUP Study Area; (f) will the “Federal ...

On June 9, 2009, the Government of Canada tabled Bill C-37 with much criticism from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and the Gatineau Park Protection Committee, who argued that the bill fell well short of offering Gatineau Park a proper legislative framework, failed to meet basic park protection criteria, would allow boundary changes, perpetuated development and road building, and would thus impair the ...[+++] park's ecological integrity.

I say “was” because, faced with the unanimity of those who testified before the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage and of the committee members themselves, the secretary of state responsible for Parks Canada finally bowed to the evidence and accepted the amendment passed by the committee suggesting that the title of the bill be changed to an “act to establish the Parks Canada Agency an ...[+++]d to amend other acts as a consequence”.

In the matter of SOR/80-127 — National Park Camping Regulations; SOR/96-169 — National Parks Highway Traffic Regulations, amendment; SOR/96-170 — National Parks Garbage Regulations, amendment; SOR/96-245 — National Parks Fishing Regulations, amendment; SOR/97-111 — Regulations Amending the National Parks Fishing Regulations; SOR/98-268 — Regulations Amending the National Parks Fishing Regulations; SOR/99-352 — Regulations Amending the National Parks Fishing Regulations; SOR/97-102 — Regulations Amending the National Parks Wildlife Regulations; SOR/2002-237 — Regulations Amending the National Parks Lease and Licence of Occupation ...[+++]Regulations (1991); SOR/2003-302 — Regulations Amending the National Parks Fire Protection Regulations; SOR/2004-299 — Regulations Amending the National Parks Aircraft Access Regulations; SOR/2004-301 — Mingan Archipelago National Park Reserve of Canada Snowshoe Hare Regulations; SOR/2005-204 — Gros Morne National Park of Canada Timber Harvesting Regulations; and SOR/2005-205 — Gros Morne National Park of Canada Snowshoe Hare Regulations, it was agreed that counsel to the committee review their status at a later date and inform the committee of the actions taken.