Traduction de «organic liquid » (Anglais → Français) :

(c) all or substantially all of the shares of the organization are owned by the municipal body or all or substantially all of the assets held by the organization are owned by the municipal body or are assets the disposition of which is controlled by the municipal body so that, in the event of a winding-up or liquidation of the organization, those assets are vested in the municipal body, or

Actually, they made a submission to the MacKay task force on that, and they recommended that CompCorp stay in its basic current state, that CDIC be privatized, if you like, so that it would be an industry organization comparable to CompCorp, and that a federal liquidity authority be established through which either of those corporations could access the Consolidated Revenue Fund if they required liquidity or had a problem.

But if we come to the point where one organization has to control the national organization because of the associational rules, that means right now the provincial governments have said, “We're fine with British Columbia, under contract from Canadian Central, managing all the liquidity for Canada for all the provinces”. But if we get to a position where we actually control that association, it's going to be very difficult for the Province of Ontario, the Province of Alberta, the Province of Manitoba, saying, “We're not prepared to hav ...[+++]e our legislative environment being in British Columbia, controlled by one province”.

(Return tabled) Question No. 890 Mr. François Choquette: With regard to the study underway by Environment Canada and the study by the Council of Canadian Economies entitled “Harnessing Science and Technology to Understand the Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction”: (a) what are the mandates for these studies; (b) what are the deadlines for these studies; (c) will these studies be made public and, if so, what process will be followed to make them public; (d) will the two studies include public consultations and, if so, (i) with what groups, (ii) where, (iii) when; (e) will the two studies include case studies and, if so, (i) what cases will be studied, (ii) will the case studies include affected sites; (f) will the studies consi ...[+++]der the role of the federal government under (i) the Indian Act, (ii) the Fisheries Act, (iii) the Navigable Waters Protection Act, (iv) the Migratory Birds Convention Act, (v) the Species at Risk Act, (vi) the Canada National Parks Act, (vii) the Canada National Marine Conservation Areas Act, (viii) the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999; (g) will the studies consider the link between the national conservation plan and shale gas; (h) will the studies examine the impact of shale gas extraction on the greenhouse gas emission targets for 2020; (i) who will receive the results of the study; (j) what parties will be consulted, including (i) groups, (ii) departments, (iii) organizations, (iv) scientists, (v) regions, (vi) associations, (vii) cities, (viii) municipalities, (ix) provinces and territories; (k) will the emissions from the following sources be studied, (i) industrial furnaces, (ii) home furnaces, (iii) stored liquids, (iv) wellhead leaks, (v) ground leaks, (vi) connection equipment; (l) will the studies include (i) direct, (ii) indirect, (iii) cumulative shale gas emissions in their greenhouse gas emissions calculations; (m) which shale gas wells will be studied; (n) will the following incidents related to ...

for the addition of dangerous substances listed in Part 2 that are explosives, flammable gases, flammable aerosols, oxidising gases, flammable liquids, self-reactive substances and mixtures, organic peroxides, pyrophoric liquids and solids, oxidising liquids and solids, together with dangerous substances falling within section P, entries P1 to P8 of Part 1.

First of all, the possibility of liquidating certain assets in a not very desirable way is not what the corporations want with regard to the redistribution of assets; second, having certain classes of members within a not-for-profit organization is an irritant for some Quebec associations; lastly, the fact that a person has a right to start up a not-for-profit organization undermines the association's purpose.