Traduction de «cas de révision préjudicielle » (Français → Anglais) :

11.Is of the opinion that all national judges should have access to databases containing pending references for preliminary rulings from all Member States; considers it equally useful for judgments of referring courts applying a preliminary ruling to be further publicised, as is already touched upon in the Court of Justice's information note on references from national courts for a preliminary ruling ; 12.Considers, given the wealth of online information available on Community law, that judges must be trained not only in the substance of the law, but also in how to access up-to-date legal sources efficiently; 13.Welcomes the Commission's commitment to pub ...[+++]lish citizens" summaries of Community legal acts, and considers that such non-legalistic summaries would also help legal practitioners to access relevant information more quickly; 14.Encourages the development of online tools and initiatives in the field of e-learning, which, whilst not being a complete answer to training, should be seen as complementary to face-to-face contact between judges and trainers; Towards a more structured framework for judicial training in the European Union

11. Is of the opinion that all national judges should have access to databases containing pending references for preliminary rulings from all Member States; considers it equally useful for judgments of referring courts applying a preliminary ruling to be further publicised, as is already touched upon in the Court of Justice’s information note on references from national courts for a preliminary ruling;

11.Is of the opinion that all national judges should have access to databases containing pending references for preliminary rulings from all Member States; considers it equally useful for judgments of referring courts applying a preliminary ruling to be further publicised, as is already touched upon in the Court of Justice's information note on references from national courts for a preliminary ruling ; 12.Considers, given the wealth of online information available on Community law, that judges must be trained not only in the substance of the law, but also in how to access up-to-date legal sources efficiently; 13.Welcomes the Commission's commitment to pub ...[+++]lish citizens" summaries of Community legal acts, and considers that such non-legalistic summaries would also help legal practitioners to access relevant information more quickly; 14.Encourages the development of online tools and initiatives in the field of e-learning, which, whilst not being a complete answer to training, should be seen as complementary to face-to-face contact between judges and trainers; Towards a more structured framework for judicial training in the European Union

Finally, a German judge considered that the Jurifast database available on the website of the Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union contained adequate information on judgments in other Member States. It also gave a good overview of pending preliminary rulings and the application of preliminary rulings by national courts.

In the absence of any DNA evidence, this of course involves a hearing, an appreciation of all the witness testimony and documentary evidence, and very often competing submissions made by the Crown and made by counsel for the wrongfully convicted, as well as the processes of independent reviews, as I indicated.

insists that the abovementioned revision should not take place before the power for the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give preliminary rulings is guaranteed;