Traduction de «cross-country analysis » (Anglais → Français) :

L. whereas there is still a lack of sufficiently detailed and comparable data at European level for purposes of comprehensive cross-country monitoring and analysis linking antimicrobial use and resistance;

L. whereas there is still a lack of sufficiently detailed and comparable data at European level for purposes of comprehensive cross-country monitoring and analysis linking antimicrobial use and resistance;

25. Notes that the EU should have capacity to adjust and reform its internal governance structures in order to ensure a decision-making process able to reflect its plurality and create consensus; stresses the importance that a coherent foreign policy approach at EU level towards the BRICS and other emerging countries be reflected in the functioning of the EEAS; believes that the EEAS should review and strengthen strategic partnerships with individual BRICS countries, in close consultation with Parliament, exploiting their specificities and the potential for synergies and cooperation with the EU; urges the EEAS to devise horizontal and vertical coordination mechanisms that will enable EU foreign policy to benefit from EU institutional syn ...[+++]ergies and from the density and depth of Member States' bilateral ties with strategic partners, including the BRICS and other emerging powers; takes the view that, with regard to the BRICS, in addition to its organisation along geographical and thematic lines, the EEAS should establish an ad hoc coordinating mechanism to ensure that all individual policies towards the BRICS are compatible from a systemic point of view and that the policy lines adopted are reflected in the EU dialogue with emerged powers such as the USA, Canada and Japan; believes that the EU delegations in BRICS countries and other relevant emerging powers should liaise more closely with one another in order to ensure continuous monitoring and analysis on relations amongst the BRICS and relevant cross-sensitivities, thus enabling a more systemic approach; takes the view in this regard that EU Delegations in BRICS countries should analyse the positions of BRICS countries on governance and global challenges and on relations with other BRICS countries; believes that the EU should direct renewed efforts and resources to leading the reform process of a global system of governance and of international organisations with a view to ensuring a more inclusive consensus- ...

10. Emphasises the need to provide sufficient clarity and more flexibility and ensure better-targeted assistance, particularly aimed at civil society, respect of human rights and aspirations towards democracy including at local and regional level, so as to promote a bottom-up approach; underlines the importance of guaranteeing the rapid identification and elimination of shortcomings in the future and thus increasing the quality and effectiveness of EU assistance; calls also, in the context of the ENP review, for a comprehensive efficiency analysis of ENPI in coordination with other instruments such as EIDHR, with the aim of making bett ...[+++]er use of the financial instruments available in the EU’s relations with southern and eastern neighbours and in cross-border cooperation, and of ensuring that EU assistance is used adequately in beneficiary countries based on conditionality of the ‘more for more’ concept and differentiated according to the specific situation of each beneficiary country; calls likewise for a critical analysis of the lending activities and policies of the European Investment Bank before it is given a more prominent role in EU support for neighbouring countries, in particular in the Southern Mediterranean;

For the purpose of the analysis, this Communication defines border regions as regions at the NUTS II level [2] bordering (by land or sea) candidate countries currently negotiating accession which contain cross-border programmes under INTERREG III A in the period 2000-2006; this also includes regions enclosed by such regions (see map in Annex x).

Even enhanced cooperation with consumer protection organisations and cross-border authority for these consumer protection organisations may, in the final analysis, be more helpful on a daily basis than a theoretical dispute between the principle of the country of destination and the principle of the country of origin.