Traduction de «cut-over » (Anglais → Français) :

8. Rejects the Council's argument that the proposed cuts correspond to under-implemented or low-performing programmes, since Council's cuts in commitments affect mostly the implementation capacity of a new generation of multiannual programmes which have not yet started; furthermore, Council's cuts in payments affect mostly the completion of programmes that have shown not only good implementation rates but even over-implementation (e.g. the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, Galileo, Customs and Fiscalis under Heading 1a, ESF, ERDF and the Cohesion Fund under Heading 1b); emphasises in particular that such cuts in payment appropriations completely disregard the multiannual character of the Union's policies, and of cohe ...[+++]sion policy in particular; underlines the fact that 52% of the payment appropriations requested in the 2014 draft budget are devoted to the completion of programmes under the 2007 - 2013 MFF;

8. Rejects the Council's argument that the proposed cuts correspond to under-implemented or low-performing programmes, since Council's cuts in commitments affect mostly the implementation capacity of a new generation of multiannual programmes which have not yet started; furthermore, Council's cuts in payments affect mostly the completion of programmes that have shown not only good implementation rates but even over-implementation (e.g. the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, Galileo, Customs and Fiscalis under Heading 1a, ESF, ERDF and the Cohesion Fund under Heading 1b); emphasises in particular that such cuts in payment appropriations completely disregard the multiannual character of the Union's policies, and of cohe ...[+++]sion policy in particular; underlines the fact that 52 % of the payment appropriations requested in the 2014 draft budget are devoted to the completion of programmes under the 2007 - 2013 MFF;

Notes that each year the EU budget shows a surplus and that the Member States’ contributions to the EU budget are lowered by this amount; at the same time deplores the Council’s regular linear cuts to the Commission’s estimations for payment appropriations, as entered in the draft budget, as well as the Council’s repeated objection, over the last years, to providing the EU budget with the level of additional payments needed by the Commission, at the end of the budgetary year, to enable the EU to meet its financial commitments; is of the opinion that such an approach is not good budgeting, and that, while the returned surplus has no impact on the overall deficit level of Member States, this amount could make a clear difference to the EU’s ...[+++]annual budget; recalls the commitment made by the institutions to revise the Financial Regulation in order to allow the carry-over of unused appropriations and of the budgetary balance;

Over time it will bring consumers and businesses all over the world benefits in terms of lower prices, by cutting remaining high tariffs in key partner markets;

Econometric estimates show that policies that boost the job prospects of ‘marginal’ workers – such as fiscal incentives for temporary and part-time work, targeted tax cuts for low-skilled/low-income workers, employment subsidies, direct job creation schemes and in-work benefits – may have raised employment by slightly over 1% over the 2001-06 period in countries where such policies were implemented; there would also have been a limited negative impact on productivity growth in the range of ¼ to ½%, or around 25% of the employment gain.

What is more, where a scientific diagnosis reveals an impending threat, it would be highly unreasonable to give priority to avoiding a sudden cut in TACs over any other consideration.