Traduction de «criminal decision » (Anglais → Français) :

criminal decision | criminal law decision | decision in criminal matters

mutual recognition of criminal decisions

decision in criminal proceedings | decision in a criminal case | criminal judgment

Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters | Data Protection Framework Decision | DPFD [Abbr.]

Crime and Criminal Justice in the Mediterranean Area: Promotion of Informed Decision-Making and International Cooperation

decision (EU) [ Commission Decision | Community decision | Council Decision | decision of the European Central Bank | decision of the European Council | decision of the European Parliament | European Council decision ]

Federal Act of 19 March 2010 on the Implementation of Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

law of criminal procedure | criminal procedure law | criminal procedural law | criminal procedure

Ontario Court of Justice Criminal Proceedings Rules [ Ontario Supreme Court Rules Respecting Criminal Proceedings - Part I | Ontario Supreme Court Rules Respecting Pre-hearing Conferences in Criminal Matters | Ontario District Court Rules Respecting Pre-hearing Conferences in Criminal Matters | Ontario County and ]

Criminal Law Reform Act, 1984 [ An Act to amend the Criminal Code, to amend an Act to amend the Criminal Code and to amend the Combines Investigation Act, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1977, the Customs Act, the Customs Tariff, the Excise Act, the Food and Drugs Act, the Narcotic Cont ]

It would primarily cover criminal decisions because unfortunately the vast majority of decisions deal with criminal matters.

Mr. Jacques Fournier: It is not limited to criminal decisions.

take any non-criminal decisions related to the breach;

(Return tabled) Question No. 1306 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the crisis in Syria: (a) what criteria does the government use to determine (i) whether to intervene, (ii) when to intervene, (iii) the nature and scope of any intervention; (b) who makes the determination in (a) and how; (c) what sources does the government rely upon in determining (a); (d) what legal obligations are considered with respect to (a) and in what ways does the Responsibility to Protect doctrine factor into decision making under (a); (e) in what ways has the government evaluated its obligations under the Responsibility to Protect doctrine with respect to ...[+++] Syria; (f) when were such evaluations done, by whom, and with what outcome; (g) have the criteria by which the government determines its official policy towards the crisis in Syria changed since 2012; (h) when the Minister of Foreign Affairs publicly expressed his support for an indictment of Bashar al-Assad by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2012, was this the position of the government and does it remain the position of the government that al-Assad ought to be indicted by the ICC; (j) with respect to Canada’s decision not to sign on to the request of 57 countries made in January, 2013, to ask the Security Council to refer the situation in Syria to the ICC, did Canada support this request; (k) with respect to (j), when, why, how, and by whom were the determinations made in this regard, and when was Canada approached to join in this endeavor and by what means; (l) what criteria were applied in determining whether to support this effort; (m) are there any specific policies or directives within the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade that guide decision-making with regard to Canadian intervention in situations of humanitarian crisis; (n) was the decision not to sign the Swiss-led letter asking the United Nations Security Council to refer the situation in Syria to the ICC made by the Minister of Fore ...