Traduction de «forced circulation » (Anglais → Français) :

We suggest the adding of a new paragraph allowing a transitional period of three years from January 1, 2012, whereby Member States may provide specific derogations from the provisions of the first sentence of Article 4 paragraph 1, for coin-processing machines that have been in use at the time this Regulation enters into force and that have proved their capability to detect counterfeit euro coins, euro coins unfit for circulation and other coin-like objects that are not genuine euro coins, even if they are not included in the list on ...[+++]the website referred to in Article 5 paragraph 3.

8. Considers compliance with air quality norms as laid down in EU legislation as crucial given the increase in respiratory, cardiovascular and other diseases related to air pollution, mainly resulting from transport. Takes the view that, in order to address the issue, preventive measures should be incentivised, for instance by introducing high-quality filters for the ultra-fine solid particles emitted by engines, and that incentives must be provided to renew any of the currently circulating car fleet that is not in line with the European Euro 4, Euro 5 and Euro 6 standards (the latter is due to enter into force in 2014). The reduction in ...[+++] emissions must not be restricted only to vehicles using new technology, i.e. with new engines, but should concern also those already in circulation. Old-generation engines can be adapted by using the new filter, with a view to achieving the low level of ultra-fine solid particles emissions of new vehicles. Favours, in particular in urban contexts, low emission zones (such as 30 areas, i.e. urban areas in which maximum vehicle speed is limited to 30 km/h) and traffic calming measures which provide an incentive for walking and cycling;

The Commission also decided today to send reasoned opinions to Austria, Germany, Spain, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal and the United Kingdom for failing to bring into force European legislation on the technical roadside inspections of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Community .

Military forces refers to the Canadian forces: (1) Every one who wilfully (a) interferes with, impairs or influences the loyalty or discipline of a member of a force, (b) publishes, edits, issues, circulates or distributes a writing that advises, counsels or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny or refusal of duty by a member of a force, or (c) advises, counsels, urges or in any manner causes insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny or refusal of duty by a member of a force, is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a period of f ...[+++]ive years.

This is talking about influence and this is exactly what was done, in my estimation. The section continues: (b) publishes, edits, issues, circulates or distributes a writing that advises, counsels or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny or refusal of a duty by a member of a force, or in any manner causes insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny or refusal of duty by a member of a force is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.

Section 62 makes no reference to sedition, but it does say: ``everyone who willfully publishes, edits, issues, circulates or distributes a writing that advises, counsels or urges insubordination or disloyalty by a member of a force''-meaning the armed forces-``is guilty of an indictable offence''.