Traduction de «in-motion test » (Anglais → Français) :

I would suggest that when people have motions, they might test them out on the clerk to see if they're within the rules. Maybe then they could test their motions out with a researcher, supposing those motions are of a scientific nature, to see that they actually are feasible or that there is some scientific basis for them, before taking up the committee's time with motions that we, as lay people, are inclined to think would be a good thing.

Now I understand that the methods for health effects will not be produced until 2004; these test strategies that are to be developed through OECD systems have become something of a perpetual motion machine.

The motion for a resolution, presented by the rapporteur in committee, was, in its turn, a balanced synthesis of the conclusions that could be drawn from our inquiries. These dealt with the many ethical and political problems raised by the major scientific breakthroughs of recent years: the development of genetic tests which open up prospects of early identification and possible remedies for serious degenerative diseases, but also pose risks for the protection of personal data.

Mrs. Jan Brown (Calgary Southeast, Ref) moved: Motion No. 128 That Bill C-12 be amended by adding after line 29, on page 96, the following new Clause: ``110.1 The Commission shall, no later than thirty days before a pilot project is tested, cause a notice to be published in the Canada Gazette that contains the following: (a) a statement that the Commission is preparing to test a pilot project; (b) the nature and objectives of the pilot project; (c) a description of the operation of the pilot project; (d) a statement of how long the pilot project will last and when testing will commence; (e) a statement that a detailed description of ...[+++]the pilot project may be obtained free of charge, on request by any person, from the Commission at the address set out in the notice; and (f) an invitation to all interested persons to make representations before the Commission respecting the pilot project and the time period for doing so'.

On a more technical note, the motion is deficient in that while it intends to remove the 10% income test in paragraph 149.1(d)(5), it leaves in that paragraph the reference to subsection 1.2 which becomes meaningless in the absence of the 10% income test. The actual motion presented to this House does not reflect what I believe the Reform Party was intending to do to begin with.

For example, a typical test will consist in subjecting a building of four or five storeys to the cyclic motions representative of a major earthquake.