Traduction de «matter fact » (Anglais → Français) :

issue of fact | matter of fact | question of fact

as a matter of fact [ in point of fact | actually | really | in fact ]

matter of fact | question of fact

collateral fact | collateral issue | collateral matter | subordinate fact

fact that is a matter of common knowledge [ matter of common knowledge ]

Syndrome with characteristics of precocious puberty (due to Leydig cell hyperplasia), progressive spastic paraplegia and intellectual deficit. It has been described in two brothers. The fact that other family members displayed brisk reflexes and dysa

as a matter of actual fact

representation of the facts | description of the matter | description of the circumstances

A rare genetic neurological disorder defined by early-onset of neurologic symptoms, biphasic clinical course, unique MRI features (including extensive, symmetrical, deep white matter abnormalities), and increased lactate in body fluids. The severe fo

A disorder of the white matter of the brain causing neurological problems, which can occur, anytime from childhood to adulthood. Characteristics of the disease include learning disabilities, retinopathy, atrophy of the optic nerves, spasticity, infer

This was expressed with the huge abstentions at the last European elections, with the referenda and 'no' votes on the European Constitution in France and Holland, with the reactions to the euro and inflation and with the huge movements against privatisation (in education, health and welfare) and employment relations (in insurance and other matters), facts which prove that the credibility of the European Union is on the wane in the eyes of the people.

Recognises attempts by the Council and the Commission to organise a second round of the European Union-Uzbekistan dialogue on human rights in May 2008 and commends the Commission on its efforts to organise a civil society seminar on media expression in the margins of the dialogue, possibly in Tashkent; points out once again that the holding of a dialogue on human rights and experts' meetings on the 2005 Andijan massacre do not in themselves constitute progress and cannot be used as a reason for the lifting of sanctions; notes that the absence of an independent international inquiry into the Andijan massacre and the lack of any improvement in the human rights situation in Uzbekistan — these being the conditions laid down by the European Un ...[+++]ion for the lifting of sanctions — have logically led to the sanctions against Uzbekistan being extended; welcomes the fact that the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 15-16 October 2007 have introduced specific conditions which have to be met within a period of six months in order for the visa restriction suspension to be maintained; invites the Council and the Commission to carry out a serious assessment of the impact of the decision to suspend for six months some of the visa restrictions that form part of the European Union sanctions against Uzbekistan, and to review the overall human rights situation in the country; deplores the fact that Uzbekistan has so far failed to deliver any progress in any of these respects; pays tribute to the work done by its Subcommittee on Human Rights in closely monitoring the human rights situation every six months so as to provide the Council with regular parliamentary assessments and recommendations as regards the EU policy to be adopted in this matter; is appalled by the presidential election held on 23 December 2007 in Uzbekistan, which according to the ODIHR was ‘held in a strictly controlled political environment, leaving no room for real opposition, a ...

The fact that there is only one plant in Italy at which such oil is used in the production cycle is simply a matter of fact which is not capable of altering the fact, which is not disputed, that the provision is of general scope.

– (IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, in view of the extremely serious matter raised by certain newspapers, and if what for now remains mere supposition or fantasy is actually confirmed, then I too consider that Parliament has a duty to play its part in shedding light on the matter and ensuring that there is complete transparency in the relations between the European Union and all non-EU countries. I believe, however, that it would have been more useful right now to spend our time debating more concrete facts.