Traduction de «public administration » (Anglais → Français) :

public administration [ general government ]

administration headquarters [ public administration location | public administration relocation | public body headquarters | public body location | public body relocation | public institution headquarters | public institution location | public institution relocation ]

civil service administrator | public service director | public administration manager | public body administrator

Community programme on interoperability solutions for European public administrations | interoperability solutions for European public administrations | ISA programme | programme on interoperability solutions for European public administrations | ISA [Abbr.]

public authorities [ Public administration(STW) ]

government administrative officer | local authority administrator | civil service administrative officer | public administrative officer

Code of good administrative behaviour | Code of good administrative behaviour for staff of the European Commission in their relations with the public | code of good administrative conduct

Minister for Public Administration | Minister of Public Administration

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

perform administrative duties on a small vessel | performing administrative duties on a small vessel | fulfilling small vessel administrative duties | peform small vessel administrative duties

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 52016IP0279 - EN - European Parliament resolution of 9 June 2016 for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration (2016/2610(RSP)) // P8_TA(2016)0279 // A regulation for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration // European Parliament resolution of 9 June 2016 for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration (2016/2610(RSP)) // ...[+++] Proposal for a // REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

7. Stresses that a professional public administration is instrumental in the successful implementation of all other reforms; therefore welcomes the fact that the Civil Service Law has started to be implemented, and calls for its proper implementation to be pursued in order to enhance administrative capacities, depoliticise public administration and fight corruption in the civil service, to strengthen meritocracy in appointments, promotions and dismissals, to increase the efficiency, transparency, accountability, professionalism and financial sustainability of the civil service, and to enhance good governance at all levels; calls for a ...[+++]strengthening of human resources management, an evaluation system for civil servants and independent monitoring of the implementation of civil service legislation; encourages the finalisation of a comprehensive public administration reform strategy and the continued promotion of depolarisation and knowledge of EU law and decision-making processes; stresses the need to enhance public integrity, to improve public services and to manage public resources more effectively; calls for improved public access to services and information; welcomes in this regard the new law on access to information; calls for a strengthening of the institution of the Ombudsman by giving appropriate follow-up to its findings and recommendations;

34. Welcomes the new public administration reform strategy, the creation of a dedicated Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government, and the increased focus on policy planning and coordination following the establishment of the Secretariat for Public Policies, as positive steps towards a more efficient public administration; expresses its concern at the lack of transparency in recruitment of public administration employees and administrative and management capacity at the local level; urges the authorities to ensure a transparent and merit-based process of appointment and promotion of civil servants and public officials ...[+++];

32. Welcomes the new public administration reform strategy, the creation of a dedicated Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government, and the increased focus on policy planning and coordination following the establishment of the Secretariat for Public Policies, as positive steps towards a more efficient public administration; expresses its concern at the lack of transparency in recruitment of public administration employees and administrative and management capacity at the local level; urges the authorities to ensure a transparent and merit-based process of appointment and promotion of civil servants and public officials ...[+++];