Traduction de «evaluate matter » (Anglais → Français) :

(6) The Governor in Council may not consent to the expropriation before the expiration of the period referred to in subsection (5) or, if the First Nation has referred the matter to a neutral evaluator, before the neutral evaluator has reported on the matter.

Question No. 437 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the appointment of Justice Marc Nadon: (a) who did what and when prior to the Selection Panel being convened; (b) who determined the process to be followed with respect to the most recent appointment process to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC); (c) was the process for Justice Wagner designed with the departure of Justice Fish a year later in mind; (d) was the process for Justice Nadon designed with the forthcoming departure of Justice LeBel in mind; (e) in the breakdown of appointment process costs provided in the answer to Q-239, what accounts for the “Acquisition ...[+++] of Machinery and Equipment” cost associated with the appointment of Justice Marc Nadon; (f) was there a competitive bidding process with respect to the goods and services in (a); (g) what accounts for the greater cost of “Legal Services” for the appointment of Justice Marc Nadon relative to the reported costs provided in the answer to Q-239 for other Justices; (h) are the costs for the legal opinions of Justices Binnie and Charron included in the “Legal Services” heading for the appointment process of Justice Marc Nadon reported in the answer to Q-239; (i) if the answer to (f) is no, under what heading are these opinion costs found and, if not reported in the answer to Q-239, where are they reported; (j) were the legal opinions of any Quebec jurists explicitly sought with respect to the eligibility of Justice Marc Nadon and, if so, (i) whose opinions were sought, (ii) on what date, (iii) at what cost; (k) were the legal opinions of any Quebec jurists explicitly sought with respect to the eligibility of a federal judge to assume a Quebec seat on the SCC and, if so, (i) whose opinions were sought, (ii) on what date, (iii) at what cost; (l) how long will the materials relative to Justice Nadon's appointment remain on the website for the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada; (m) when were these material ...

(Return tabled) Question No. 170 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the victims' surcharge: (a) for each of the last ten years, broken down by province and year; how much was collected; (b) broken down by program and service, how was the money in (a) spent; (c) broken down by province and year, in what percent of cases was a surcharge imposed; (d) since the enactment of the Increasing Offenders’ Accountability for Victims Act (IOAVA), how much, broken down by province and territory, has been collected; (e) for the ten years prior to the enactment of the IOAVA, how much money has the government given to victims' programs and services, broken down by program or service; (f) for the ten years prior to the enactment of the IOAVA, how much ...[+++]money has the government transferred to provinces for victims' programs and services, broken down by program or service; (g) for the ten years prior to the enactment of the IOAVA, broken down by year and province, in how many cases did a judge provide more than 20 years for surcharge repayment; (h) for the ten years prior to the enactment of the IOAVA, broken down by year and province, what were the mean, median, mode, and value of surcharges collected; (i) since the enactment of the IOAVA, broken down by year and province, what were the mean, median, and mode, and value of surcharges collected; (j) since the enactment of the IOAVA, how much money has the government given to victims' programs and services, broken down by program or service; (k) since the enactment of the IOAVA, in what specific cases, broken down by province, has a surcharge not been imposed; (l) since the enactment of the IOAVA, in what specific cases, broken down by province, has the collection of a surcharge been delayed more than 20 years; (m) prior to the enactment of the IOAVA, in which specific cases was the constitutionality of the surcharge challenged; (n) prior to the enactment of the IOAVA, in which specific cases did the Crown appeal on a matte ...

The evaluation team will consist of no more than three experts, designated by the Member States taking part in the automated data exchange in the data categories to be evaluated, who have experience regarding the concerned data category, have the appropriate national security clearance to deal with these matters and are willing to take part in at least one evaluation visit in another Member State.

Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety provides for open and transparent public consultation, directly or through representative bodies, during the preparation, evaluation and revision of food law, except where the urgency of the matter does not allow it.

IVEUROPEAN REFUGEE FUND PAGEREF _Toc484330113 \h IVCOMMUNITY READMISSION AGREEMENTS PAGEREF _Toc484330114 \h IVRIGHT TO FAMILY REUNIFICATION PAGEREF _Toc484330115 \h VTEMPORARY PROTECTION PAGEREF _Toc484330116 \h VIASYLUM AND MIGRATION : ACTIVITY REPORT OF THE HIGH LEVEL WORKING GROUP PAGEREF _Toc484330117 \h VITERRORISM - THREAT ASSESSMENT PAGEREF _Toc484330118 \h VIISTATE OF PLAY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TAMPERE EUROPEAN COUNCIL PAGEREF _Toc484330119 \h VII?MUTUAL RECOGNITION PAGEREF _Toc484330120 \h VII?EUROJUST PAGEREF _Toc484330121 \h VII?EUROPEAN POLICE COLLEGE PAGEREF _Toc484330122 \h VII?EXTERNAL RELATIONS IN JHA PAGEREF _Toc484330123 \h VII?SCOREBOARD PAGEREF _Toc484330124 \h VIIICHILD PORNOGRAPHY ON THE INTERNET PAGEREF _Toc48 ...[+++]4330125 \h VIIIINFORMATION TO NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS IN THE JHA FIELD PAGEREF _Toc484330126 \h VIIICONVENTION ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS PAGEREF _Toc484330127 \h VIIICOOPERATION BETWEEN FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNITS PAGEREF _Toc484330128 \h IXCOMBATING FRAUD AND COUNTERFEITING OF NON-CASH PAYMENT MEANS PAGEREF _Toc484330129 \h IXSTATUS OF THE VICTIM IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PAGEREF _Toc484330130 \h IXALTERNATIVE METHODS OF SETTLING DISPUTES UNDER CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL LAW - CONCLUSIONS PAGEREF _Toc484330131 \h XEUROPEAN JUDICIAL NETWORK PAGEREF _Toc484330132 \h XANY OTHER BUSINESS PAGEREF _Toc484330133 \h X?TASK FORCE CHIEFS OF POLICE PAGEREF _Toc484330134 \h X?CONFERENCE ON CRIME PREVENTION PAGEREF _Toc484330135 \h XIMIXED COMMITTEE AT MINISTERIAL LEVEL WITH NORWAY AND ICELAND PAGEREF _Toc484330136 \h XIITEMS APPROVED WITHOUT DEBATEJUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS PAGEREF _Toc484330137 \h XI--Penal sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the Euro * PAGEREF _Toc484330138 \h XI--EU Organised Crime Situation Report (1998) PAGEREF _Toc484330139 \h XII--Service of Documents PAGEREF _Toc484330140 \h XII--Insolvency proceedings * PAGEREF _Toc484330141 \h XII--Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in ...