Traduction de «Blocage d'une ouverture entre deux pierres » (Français → Anglais) :

Where two or more national members can not agree on how to resolve a case of conflict of jurisdiction as regards the undertaking of investigations or prosecution pursuant to Article 6 and in particular Article 6(1)(c), the College shall be asked to issue a written non-binding opinion on the case, provided the matter could not be resolved through mutual agreement between the competent national authorities concerned.

the opening-up of procurement markets between the United States and the EU despite the barriers which EU companies still face when trying to access the American market; this calls for the deepening of relations between the two partners at bilateral level and the definition of a clear framework at multilateral level, such as within the World Trade Organization (WTO).

The signatories welcomed the two agreements as a further significant step towards the strengthening of existing relations between the two parties and stressed the economic importance of the mutual opening of procurement markets.

On the basis of that principle, the Commission has dealt differently with two categories of joint venture agreement between airlines: - it has granted individual six-year exemptions for three agreements concluded between a national carrier and a smaller airline1 in respect of the introduction of new services, while at the same time reserving the right to reassess the economic and legal situation in two years time; ./. Air France - NFD Luftverkehrs AG (Paris-Nuremberg); Air France - Brymon (Paris-London City Airport); Sabena - London City Airways (Brussels-London City Airport). - 2 - - it has expressed doubts conce ...[+++]rning six other agreements concluded between national carriers and involving routes already operated for some time,2 pointing out that the airlines have not demonstrated that the joint venture agreements are essential for maintaining the routes in question and that the joint operation is likely to eliminate or affect appreciably all current or potential competition on the market for transport between the cities concerned.

PREAMBLE 1. The European Union and the Southern African Development Community (SADC): - Reaffirming the universal values and ideals which are shared by their peoples and governments and which have their expression in the respect of human dignity; - Expressing their conviction that the protection and promotion of human rights are a cornerstone of democratic societies and that the effective exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms is the legitimate concern of the international community and inseparable from the pursuit of international peace and security; - Recalling their commitment to build, consolidate, and strengthen democratic institutions founded on accountability, transparency, good governance, and the ...[+++]rule of law; - Recognising that peace and security are essential prerequisites for sustainable economic and social development; - Mindful of historical, political, cultural and economic links between Europe and the Southern African region; - Recalling the long standing cooperation between the two regions as expressed in bilateral and multilateral frameworks, in particular the Lome Convention; - Welcoming the demise of apartheid in South Africa and the successful transition to multi-party democracy across the region which opens up new perspectives for Southern Africa; - Bearing in mind the ongoing peace processes in Angola and Mozambique and reiterating their commitment to support transition to multi- party democracy in those countries; - Desirous of promoting national reconstruction, regional cooperation and integration in Southern Africa; - Recognising that the Southern African region has a substantial development potential through closer cooperation; Have decided to enter into a comprehensive dialogue to further the development of relations between the two regions, taking into account other bilateral and multilateral arrangements and without prejudice to the Lome Convention.

DRAFT COMMISSION DIRECTIVES ON - MOBILE AND PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS - IMPLEMENTATION OF FULL COMPETITION IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS The Council held a wide-ranging exchange of views on the above draft Directives based on Article 90(3) of the Treaty; it then adopted the following conclusions: "The COUNCIL - NOTES that the Commission requested, on 3 August 1995, any comments from the Council on the draft Commission Directive amending Directive 90/388/EEC as regards mobile and personal communications; sent the President-in-Office of the Council, on 29 September 1995, the draft Commission Directive amending Directive 90/388/EEC as regards the implementation of full competition in telecommunications markets; - NOTES also the public consult ...[+++]ation launched by the Commission following the publication of the two draft Directives in the Official Journal of the European Communities; - REAFFIRMS that it is important that the conditions governing the definition of the Community's future policy on the liberalization of telecommunications services and infrastructures should result from a political agreement based on the compromise of December 1989 and takes note of the Commission's support for this approach; - RECALLS in this connection the political agreement reached at the Telecommunications Council meeting on 17 November 1994, which was given concrete form in the Council Resolution of 22 December 1994 and in the statements made on that occasion; RECALLS that this Resolution recognizes in particular the principle of liberalization of telecommunication infrastructures on 1 January 1998, on the understanding that an additional transitional period is granted to certain Member States; - POINTS OUT that the Commission must also take account in its approach of the responsibilities of the European Parliament and the Council for the legislative provisions designed, on the basis of Commission proposals, to establish the European regulatory framework for telecommunications, parti ...