Traduction de «Conférence des gens d'affaires Canada-Japon » (Français → Anglais) :

6. Asks the Commission to extend its mandate of 25 June 2004 to the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), to enable it to promote harmonised treatment of third countries by the competent national authorities and provide technical advice on the assessment of equivalence of third-country national standards, other than the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAPs) of the US, Japan and Canada, to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in so far as the third countries in question are granted the possibility not to restate the financial statements from 1 January 2007 until 1 January 2009;

6. Asks the Commission to extend its mandate of 25 June 2004 to the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), to enable it to promote harmonised treatment of third countries by the competent national authorities and provide technical advice on the assessment of equivalence of third-country national standards, other than the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAPs) of the US, Japan and Canada, to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in so far as the third countries in question are granted the possibility not to restate the financial statements from 1 January 2007 until 1 January 2009;

The Commission has also a long standing cooperation in the field of employment and social affairs with Japan and the US and will envisage to extending this to Canada as well as China and possibly to other emerging economies.

15. Asks the President of the European Parliament to organise, at the beginning of 2004, a conference in the EP with parliamentarians from the USA, Canada, ACP, Latin America, Australia, Asia, and Japan to discuss further steps in both the WTO trade negotiations and reform of the WTO;

1. Throughout 2001 and 2002 the European Community and its Member States have been proactive in addressing the specific issues addressed by the Programme for Action in global fora such as G8 [25] Summits, the EU/US Summits in Queluz, Washington and Gothenburg, the EU/Canada and EU/Japan Summits in 2001, the follow-up to the Cairo Plan of Action within the EU/OAU forum (leading to the EU/AU Summit in Lisbon in 2003), the LDCIII Conference in Brussels in 2001, the UNGASS on HIV/AIDS in 2001, the Barcelona AIDS Conference in 2002, and the Doha WTO Ministerial, the Monterrey Conference and the Johannesburg Summit.

For this to happen, some countries need to speed up their ratification of the Protocol – Russia, Japan, Canada and Australia. Secondly, the political conditions must be created for the United States to rejoin the joint effort in the environmental field. Thirdly, an initiative is needed to green the economy by internalising environmental costs, dissociating economic growth from intensive resource use and focusing on cleaner technologies. Fourthly, we hope that the Summit will provide joint answers to global problems and that, as happened in Rio de Janeiro, when the foundations were laid for the Conference on Climate Change, Johannesburg w ...[+++]ill also lay the foundations for protocols and new institutions in other environmental areas, such as water, for instance. Fifthly, we hope a boost will be given to international governance and institutional reform.