Traduction de «Correction d'auteur sur épreuves » (Français → Anglais) :

author's corrections | author's alteration | AA | alteration

author's proof | clean proof | revise

author's proof [ submission proof | clean proof ]

author's proof | clean proof | submission proof

Copy Preparation and Proofreading Section

author's alteration | aa [Abbr.]

22. Stresses that copyright is an important economic basis for creativity, employment and innovation, as well as the guarantor of cultural diversity, and that it is essential to enable Europe’s creative and cultural industries to compete on a global scale; stresses that further efforts are needed in the field of copyright to strike a balance between all key actors, and that any revision of copyright law should ensure adequate protection that fosters investment and growth in the creative and cultural sector, whilst removing legal uncertainties and inconsistencies that adversely affect the functioning of the Digital S ...[+++]ingle Market (DSM); urges the Commission to review, where necessary, the regulatory framework for copyright in order to achieve a better access to creative content for European citizens, and to stimulate European researchers, educational establishments, cultural heritage institutions and the creative sector to adapt their activities to the digital world; underlines that appropriate remuneration must be paid by those who profit from the exploitation of copyright-protected works, and that any solutions in this regard should not discourage the use of legal providers; recalls that digital technologies have redefined the value chain in the cultural sector, mostly to the benefit of intermediaries and often to the detriment of creators; asks the Commission to investigate the extent and impact of such changes and to propose measures to improve the remuneration of authors and artists at European level; stresses that any revised provisions should be future-proof and technologically neutral, evidence based and carefully assessed in line with the Commission’s objective of better regulation, while taking into account the differences between the digital and analogical environments;

9. Notes that 56 % of Europeans use the internet for cultural purposes and notes, therefore, the importance of several copyright exceptions; reminds the Commission that the majority of MEPs support the examination of the application of minimum standards across the exceptions and limitations to copyright and the proper application of those exceptions and limitations which are set out in Directive 2001/29/EC; underlines that the approach to copyright exceptions and limitations should be balanced, targeted and format-neutral and should only be based on demonstrated needs, and should be without prejudice to EU cultural diversity, its financing and the fair compensation of author ...[+++]s; emphasises that while the use of text and data mining needs greater legal certainty to enable researchers and educational institutions to make wider use of copyright-protected material, including across borders, any EU-wide exception for text and data mining should apply only when the user has lawful access, and should be developed in consultation with all stakeholders following an evidence-based impact assessment;

On 27 May 2009 the applicant submitted a request for review of her written test (b), and asked for her written test (c) to be marked and for her admission, if appropriate, to the oral test.

After the application initiating proceedings had been lodged EPSO sent the applicant, by letter of 16 June 2010, the papers for written tests (a), (b) and (c), her written test scripts not showing the marks given by the selection board, and the personal evaluation sheets for tests (b) and (c).