Traduction de «Coûts des mesures d'adaptation » (Français → Anglais) :

Where appropriate, those criteria should be based on existing national and international standards and should encompass different aspects of the characteristics of the species, the risk and modes of introduction into the Union, the adverse social, economic and biodiversity impact of the species, the potential benefits of uses and the costs of mitigation to weigh them against the adverse impact, as well as on an assessment of the potential costs of environmental, social and economic damage demonstrating the significance for the Union, ...[+++]so as to further justify action.

6. The aid must not relate to measures in respect of which Community legislation provides that the cost of such measures is to be borne by the agricultural holding, unless the cost of such aid measures is entirely offset by compulsory charges on producers.

It is appropriate that Member States are aware of the costs of schemes in order to be able to accurately assess the costs of measures.

7. Highlights that the varying level of development among the 27 Member States must be taken into account when attributing the costs of adaptation to climate change in a way that will not hinder the cohesion policy and the gradual equalisation of living standards across the Member States; recalls that some Member States have already fulfilled their obligations to reduce carbon dioxide emission according to the Kyoto Protocol; recalls that the costs of adapting to a greener economy will vary among Member States depending on their level of development and energy sources, and therefore calls for support for research and development in tho ...[+++]se Member States which face considerable costs in adapting to a greener economy. The balance of commitments entered into by the developed and developing world should be a fair reflection of each country's capacity to contribute to emissions reductions;

32. Underlines that the development and implementation of National Adaptation Programs of Action (NAPAs) through the Global Environment Facility (GEF) funds has experienced several shortcomings, due to inadequate funding, underestimation of adaptation costs, weak links to human development, overly bureaucratic channels of access and a project-based bias; calls on the Commission to address fully these shortcomings when providing further support to NAPA implementation in LDCs and SIDS through the GCCA; in this context welcomes the Com ...[+++]mission's intention to explore programme-based capacity building of governance institutions using budget support;

(b) make judgements about the most cost-effective combination of measures in respect of water uses to be included in the programme of measures under Article 11 based on estimates of the potential costs of such measures.