Traduction de «Demande d'annulation d'inscription » (Français → Anglais) :

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 June 2010 in Case R 2449/2013-2 on the grounds of illegality and failure to observe the applicable legislative provisions relating to the Community trade mark, give judgment in accordance with the form of order sought set out in this application to the effect that the three-dimensional mark applied for is sufficiently inherently distinctive, grant this application and order that the three-dimensional Community trade mark application No 1 1 7 48 051 be entered into the register of trade marks in Class 30 o ...[+++]f the International Classification as it is consistent with the requirements of Community trade mark law;

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 May 2014 in Case R 1911/2013-4, because it is unlawful and infringes the legal provisions in force concerning the Community trade mark; deliver a judgment in accordance with the claims set out in the application, whether on the basis of the intrinsic distinctiveness of the three-dimensional mark applied for or the distinctiveness acquired by use, upholding the present action and ordering the registration of the application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark No 1 1 7 47 987, for goods in class ...[+++]30 of the International Classification, on the grounds that it is lawful and admissible;

Hungary thus brought an action before the Court for annulment of the Commission’s registration of the protected designation of origin ‘Vinohradnícka oblasť Tokaj’ in the E-Bacchus database in respect of Slovakia.

Annulment of Commission Decision 2009/859/EC of 30 November 2009 concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance (OJ 2009 L 314, p. 79).

While the constitutionality of only the security certificate process was before the Supreme Court, we urge the government, as recommended in our Report, to appoint a special advocate in all proceedings where confidential information results in an individual's inability to make full answer and defence. These include judicial review of a decision to list a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code and other listing regimes, judicial consideration of a certificate having the effect of denying or revoking an organizati ...[+++]on's charitable status under the Charities Registration (Security Information) Act, and applications under the Canada Evidence Act to disclose withheld information or to cancel a certificate issued by the Attorney General of Canada prohibiting disclosure.

For certainty and clarity, the Committee believes that this should be changed to “reliable and appropriate,” particularly given that these are the qualifying words used in the comparable provisions governing judicial review of the listing of a terrorist entity, consideration of a certificate having the effect of denying or revoking charitable status, applications under the Canada Evidence Act with respect to the disclosure of information, and applications to vary or cancel a certificate of the Attorney General of Canada prohibiting disclosure.