Traduction de «Division de l'évaluation de l'invalidité » (Français → Anglais) :

If it's an issue of assessing the degree or extent of disability, again, if it's a still-serving or recently released member, and if there were sufficient medical information contained on the file with respect to that specific disability, we would in the normal course accept that and consider it.

(Return tabled) Question No. 67 Mr. Sean Casey: With respect to the New Veterans Charter, the tax-free, lump-sum Disability Award, and the tax-free, lump-sum Death Benefit, between April 2005 and June 2011: (a) how many recipients of the lump-sum Disability Award or the Death Benefit filed a complaint with the Department of Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) about either benefit; (b) how many Disability Award or Death Benefit files have been forwarded to the Deputy Minister or Minister of Veterans Affairs' attention; (c) what was the nature of the problems associated with each case forwarded to the Minister in (b); (d) after receiving a lump-sum payment, how many recipients or their dependants requested additional funds; (e) has VAC experien ...[+++]ced cost savings associated with the granting of the lump-sum Disability Award and Death Benefit, as compared to other longer-term assistance measures such as, but not limited to, the disability pension and health care benefits; (f) has VAC reviewed or evaluated the lump-sum Disability Award and Death Benefit programs; and (g) what findings or conclusions have been made by any reviews or evaluations in (f)?

Furthermore, an official recognised by the Invalidity Committee as suffering from permanent invalidity regarded as total and automatically retired, pursuant to Articles 53 and 78 of the Staff Regulations, retains an interest since he can be reinstated in a post within an institution, in his career development report being drawn up fairly, objectively and in accordance with normal reporting standards.

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62009CA0236 - EN - Case C-236/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium)) — Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL, Yann van Vugt, Charles Basselier v Conseil des ministres (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Fundamental rights — Combating discrimination — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to and supply of goods and services — Insurance premiums and benefits — Actuarial factors — Sex as a factor in the assessment of insurance risks — Private life assurance contracts — Directive 2004/113/EC — Article 5(2) — Derogation not subject to any temporal ...[+++]limitation — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 21 and 23 — Invalidity) // Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium)) — Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL, Yann van Vugt, Charles Basselier v Conseil des ministres // (Case C-236/09) - ( // (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Fundamental rights - Combating discrimination - Equal treatment for men and women - Access to and supply of goods and services - Insurance premiums and benefits - Actuarial factors - Sex as a factor in the assessment of insurance risks - Private life assurance contracts - Directive 2004/113/EC - Article 5(2) - Derogation not subject to any temporal limitation - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 21 and 23 - Invalidity)

Poland introduced in 1997 stricter rules for medical invalidity assessment by shifting these tasks from doctors' committees to the social security (ZUS) doctors and France has announced that it will reinforce the effectiveness of medical controls.

I'll quickly read them to you: play a leadership role in providing a fair and comprehensive program to provide individuals and families across Canada with protection against catastrophic drug costs; support a recommendation by the federal task force on disability issues to introduce a new refundable disability expense tax credit to replace the disability tax credit and the medical expenses tax credit, and to increase the tax rate used to calculate the credit from 17% to 29% for low-income beneficiaries; make changes to the definition of “disability” and administration of the CPP disability benefits that will ensure people who cannot wo ...[+++]rk due to disability are assessed promptly and equitably; reinstate the previous eligibility criteria for CPP disability benefits, which require that individuals have contributed in two of the last three years or five of the last ten years; support a recommendation by the federal task force on disability issues, calling on the Government of Canada, in conjunction with the provinces, to ensure that an adequate disability income support system is in place and that serious consideration be given to moving toward a disability insurance program that covers all Canadians; increase the level of health research funding to 1% of the $76 billion total annual cost of health care in Canada; support the idea to establish a Canadian institute of health research to create one organization or structure that would act as the focal point for health research in Canada; enhance the tax incentives for modest-income donors; invest in the infrastructure of Canada's voluntary sector; and lastly, increase funding to voluntary organizations involved in the delivery of health-related programs and services.