Traduction de «Déficit d'adhésion leucocytaire type II » (Français → Anglais) :

Sialyl-Lewis X defect

leukocyte adhesion deficiency

leukocyte adhesion deficiency | LAD | leukocyte adhesion defect

Mo-1 deficiency

bovine leukocyte adhesion deficiency [ bovine leucocyte adhesion deficiency ]

Anaemia:haemolytic nonspherocytic (hereditary), type II | hexokinase deficiency | pyruvate kinase [PK] deficiency | triose-phosphate isomerase deficiency

(ii) a national of a country that, either directly or through its membership in an intergovernmental organization, affords protection for topographies in accordance with a convention or treaty to which that country or intergovernmental organization and Canada are contracting parties, or an individual or legal entity that has in such a country or in the territory of a member state of such an intergovernmental organization an establishment of the kind referred to in subparagraph (i),

The Main Estimates include: Program Expenditure Votes; Operating Expenditure Votes; Capital Expenditure Votes; Grants and Contributions Votes; Non-Budgetary Votes (identified by the letter L); Special Votes: Crown Corporation Deficits and Separate Legal Identities; Special Votes: Treasury Board Centrally Financed Votes (See 1998-99 Estimates, Part II, The Main Estimates, “Preface”.)

(Return tabled) Question No. 4 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to international treaties and conventions dealing in whole or in part with human rights and with Canada’s international obligations in this regard: (a) does the government have any formal or informal procedures for regular review of those international human rights treaties that Canada has not yet signed, ratified, or otherwise accepted; (b) does the government have any formal or informal guidelines according to which it determines whether the specific obligations contained in a treaty or other international undertaking conflicts with the Constitution Act, 1867, and if so where can these guidelines be accessed; (c) do the guidelines referred to in (b) specify the standard accor ...[+++]ding to which the government determines if any obligation contained in a treaty or other international undertaking violates any section of the Constitution Act, 1867; (d) has the government engaged in any review of its obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD); (e) does the government have any formal or informal guidelines according to which it determines whether the specific obligations contained in a treaty or other international undertaking require implementing legislation in order for Canada to be able to ratify or otherwise accept it, and if so where can these guidelines be accessed; (f) does the government have a position as to whether international agreements that establish a complaints mechanism or communications procedure for enforcement of the rights and obligations contained therein are necessarily unconstitutional; (g) does the government have a policy as to whether Canada will accept such agreements referred to in (f); (h) does the government undergo review of proposed international human rights agreements that would establish such a mechanism or procedure referred to in (f) on a case by case basis, (i) who is involved in this review, (ii) are the provinces and other inte ...