Traduction de «Délai d'utilisation » (Français → Anglais) :

Service level indicators should include delays for replying to requests for information on availability of elements of infrastructure, including ducts, poles, other physical assets (e.g. manholes), or distribution points; delays for replying to a request for feasibility to use elements of infrastructure; a measure of responsiveness to handle requests for access and use of elements of infrastructure; a measure of responsiveness for fault resolution processes.

7. Without prejudice to the provisions of the Specific Directives and taking into account the relevant national circumstances, Member States may lay down rules in order to prevent spectrum hoarding, in particular by setting out strict deadlines for the effective exploitation of the rights of use by the holder of the rights and by applying penalties, including financial penalties or the withdrawal of the rights of use in case of non-compliance with the deadlines. These rules shall be established and applied in a proportionate, non-discriminatory and transparent manner’.

7. Without prejudice to the provisions of the Specific Directives and taking into account the relevant national circumstances, Member States may lay down rules in order to prevent spectrum hoarding, in particular by setting out strict deadlines for the effective exploitation of the rights of use by the holder of the rights and by applying penalties, including financial penalties or the withdrawal of the rights of use in case of non-compliance with the deadlines.

The Council - regards the Treaty as the foundation for pan-European cooperation in the energy sector; - regards the implementation of the Charter by means of the Treaty as an important contribution to economic development and long-term political stability in the States of Central and Eastern Europe and the successor States of the former Soviet Union; - notes that the Treaty will contribute to * providing greater energy supply security in Europe, * modernizing the energy industries of the countries in transition and encouraging the efficient use of energy, * reducing the harmful environmental impact of energy production and consumption, * increasing trade liberalization in the energy sector, * ensuring unimpeded transit, and * promoting fo ...[+++]reign direct investment and guaranteeing foreign investors a high level of investment protection; - welcomes the fact that more than two-thirds of the Signatories to the European Energy Charter have already adopted the draft text of the Treaty; - confirms its political intention of jointly signing the Treaty with all negotiating Parties on 17 December in Lisbon; - emphasizes the need to initiate the ratification procedures as soon as possible after signature; - is satisfied with the implementation of the mandate decided by the Council at its meeting on 3 December 1991 and confirms this mandate for the negotiation of the supplementary agreement; - states that the Communities and their Member States will also make a constructive contribution in the second stage of negotiations; - states that the Communities and their Member States intend to conclude negotiations on the Nuclear Protocol as soon as possible; - decides to sign the European Energy Charter Treaty, the Final Act and the Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspects on behalf of the European Community, subject to approval, and authorizes its President to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Treaty; - notes that the Commission will sign th ...

COMMISSION GUIDELINES (a) Lead in petrol Although it regards the deadline proposed by Parliament for the compulsory introduction of unleaded petrol - 1 October 1986 - as unrealistic, it might be prepared to bring forward slightly the proposed date of 1 October 1989, provided that this is compatible with the deadlines laid down for the reduction of emissions (b) Emissions Whilst agreeing that urgent action is essential in order to protect the environment and preserve the unity of the Community's internal market for motor vehicles, the Commission takes the view that, given the time needed by the automobile industry to adjust, the deadline ...[+++]which Parliament has proposed for reaching emission standards equivalent to those in the USA - 1 October 1986 - cannot be met. Such a deadline, moreover, would probably mean excluding any technology that was cheaper than catalytic converters an might be applied subsequently.

The Governments of the Member States and the Commission of the European Communities were represented as follows: Belgium Mr Jan DE BOCK Deputy Permanent Representative Denmark Mr Jann SJURSEN Minister for Energy Mr Soeren SKAFTE State Secretary, Ministry of Industry and Energy Germany Mr Dieter von WÜRZEN State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs Greece Mr Georges APOSTOLAKIS Secretary-General for Energy Spain Mr Claudio ARANZADI Minister for Industry and Energy France Mr Gérard LONGUET Minister for Energy and External Trade Ireland Mr Brian COWEN Minister for Energy Italy Mr Paolo SAVONA Minister for Industry Luxembourg Mr Alex BODRY Minister for Energy Netherlands Mr Koos ANDRIESSEN Minister for Energy Portugal Mr Luis Filipe ...[+++]PEREIRA State Secretary for Energy United Kingdom Mr Timothy EGGAR Minister for Energy * * * Commission Mr Abel MATUTES Member NUCLEAR SAFETY IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND THE FORMER USSR - COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS "THE COUNCIL, committed to assisting with improving the nuclear safety in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union and aware of the need for sustainable, medium and long-term solutions, to energy supply problems of those coutries, 1.recalls the Council conclusions of 7 December 1992 on nuclear safety in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, involving measures under the Community's PHARE and TACIS programmes for immediate improvements in the safety of nuclear power plants; recalls the importance of the G-24 mechanism for the co-ordination of assistance programmes and the leading role of the Community in this area; recalls also the Community's intended contribution to the multilateral fund for nuclear safety in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union; 2.notes the assistance already provided by the Community for an immediate improvement in the safety of the plants in question, as presented in the report tabled by the Commiss ...