Traduction de «Lettre d'autorisation » (Français → Anglais) :

By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 16 April 2012, Austria requested authorisation to continue to apply a measure that was previously granted by Council Implementing Decision 2009/1013/EU of 22 December 2009 authorising the Republic of Austria to continue to apply a measure derogating from Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (3), derogating from the provisions of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the right of deduction.

By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 5 January 2012, Germany requested authorisation to continue to apply a measure that was previously granted by Council Decision 2009/791/EC of 20 October 2009 authorising the Federal Republic of Germany to continue to apply a measure derogating from Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (2), derogating from the provisions of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the right of deduction.

In a letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 24 November 2006, the Kingdom of the Netherlands requested authorisation to apply a special tax measure in the ready-to-wear clothing industry as previously authorised for a limited period by Council Decision 1998/20/EC (2).

212 | Summary of responses and how they have been taken into account The parties consulted welcomed the idea of a simplified, transparent and expedient common authorisation procedure. The involvement of the Member States in the authorisation procedure as compulsory relays between applicants and the Commission was criticised by the Member States. This “extra-step procedure” seems to be regarded as a bureaucratic complication that needlessly slows down the procedure. In consequence, this proposal abolishes the “letter-box” role of the national authorities in the common procedure. Some consumer organisations expressed the fear that replacin ...[+++]g codecision with the comitology procedure in the authorisation procedure for additives would reduce the current transparency. Nevertheless, use of the comitology procedure is desirable, as it establishes a common procedure for the three types of substance. Moreover, the codecision procedure currently applicable in relation to additives is an isolated case in food legislation as a whole, despite its use not being justified by a higher level of risk posed by additives. |

Those Member States which, on 1 January 1989, subjected to value added tax the transactions listed in Annex E, points 4 and 5, are authorized to apply the conditions of Article 13A (2) (a), final indent, also to services rendered and goods delivered, as referred to in Article 13A (1) (m) and (n), where such activities are carried out by bodies governed by public law.

that consumers using bills of exchange are suitably protected, when such practices are allowed.