Traduction de «Maintien de consolidation d'un tarif douanier » (Français → Anglais) :

The World Bank has cautioned that as the global recession continues there is every risk that countries will begin to raise tariffs to bound levels or utilize unused subsidy room to help support their domestic industries.

5. Notes that India's high import tariffs and, despite recent significant progress, non-tariff barriers, remain a genuine concern for EU industry; believes that upholding such a protectionist policy after economic liberalisation gives rise to market distortions and manipulations; is concerned that WTO tariff negotiations have not led to any improvement (there was no binding of tariffs or commitment to maximum "binding" rates, which were also kept high) and that efforts consequently made by the Commission to open a bilateral dialogue with India on the subject of specific distortions have so far been unsuccessful; notes that a reduction ...[+++] in trade barriers can bring progressive improvements in trading conditions with the objective of promoting growth, employment and sustainable development; calls on India to bind its import tariffs at levels closer to its applied rates within the context of the DDA and to make further efforts to remove part of the existing non-tariff barriers; encourages the High Level Trade Group to work towards eliminating tariffs between the parties on substantially all trade through a bilateral free trade agreement, thus providing opportunities for existing and potential exporters to develop their business and diversify their export base;

5. Notes that India's high import tariffs and, despite recent significant progress, non-tariff barriers, remain a genuine concern for EU industry; believes that upholding such a protectionist policy after economic liberalisation gives rise to market distortions and manipulations; is concerned that WTO tariff negotiations have not led to any improvement (there was no binding of tariffs or commitment to maximum "binding" rates, which were also kept high) and that efforts consequently made by the Commission to open a bilateral dialogue with India on the subject of specific distortions have so far been unsuccessful; notes that a reduction ...[+++] in trade barriers can bring progressive improvements in trading conditions with the objective of promoting growth, employment and sustainable development; calls on India to bind its import tariffs at levels closer to its applied rates within the context of the DDA and to make further efforts to remove part of the existing non-tariff barriers; encourages the High Level Trade Group to work towards eliminating tariffs between the parties on substantially all trade through a bilateral free trade agreement, thus providing opportunities for existing and potential exporters to develop their business and diversify their export base;

5. Notes that India's high import tariffs and, despite recent significant progress, non-tariff barriers, remain a genuine concern for EU industry; believes that upholding such a protectionist policy after economic liberalisation gives rise to market distortions and manipulations; is concerned that WTO tariff negotiations have not led to any improvement (there was no binding of tariffs or commitment to maximum "binding" rates, which were also kept high) and that efforts consequently made by the Commission to open a bilateral dialogue with India on the subject of specific distortions have so far been unsuccessful; notes that a reduction ...[+++] in trade barriers can bring progressive improvements in trading conditions with the objective of promoting growth, employment and sustainable development; calls on India to bind its import tariffs at levels closer to its applied rates within the context of the DDA and to make further efforts to remove part of the existing non-tariff barriers; encourages the High Level Trade Group to work towards eliminating tariffs between the parties on substantially all trade through a bilateral free trade agreement, thus providing opportunities for existing and potential exporters to develop their business and diversify their export base;

It should be noted that the Big Three support the maintenance of the 6.1 per cent vehicle tariff, despite the fact that their non-NAFTA vehicle imports (Volvo, Mercedes, Saab, et cetera) will be subject to the tariff.

As a result of this exercise, the Commission decided: - to require abolition of the APIM in stages, reducing it by 20% of the initial level as of 31 December each year starting in 1996; - to maintain the exemptions, authorizing the Spanish authorities to maintain them in full until 31 December 2000.[1] Customs The Commission was also required to draw conclusions on the effects of Community measures such as the gradual application of the Common Customs Tariff (CCT) to ...[+++]the Canary Islands, and to put forward appropriate measures for the second half of the transitional period, from 31 December 1995 onwards.[2] The Commission has presented the Council with a proposal for a Regulation setting out arrangements for maintaining existing tariff suspensions, for various products, until 2001, and gradually introducing the tariffs in question.[3] It proposed that the present arrangements be extended until 31 March 1996 to allow the Council time to consider the matter.