Traduction de «Poste regroupé par secteur d'intérêt » (Français → Anglais) :

For each credit assessment system, the ECAF performance monitoring process consists of an annual ex-post comparison of: (a) the observed default rates for all eligible entities and instruments rated by the credit assessment system, where these entities and instruments are grouped into static pools based on certain characteristics, e.g. credit rating, asset class, industry sector, credit assessment model; and (b) the appropriate cr ...[+++]edit quality threshold of the Eurosystem given by the benchmark PD (two benchmark PDs are considered: a 0,10 % PD over a one-year horizon which is considered equivalent to a credit assessment of credit quality step 2; and a 0,40 % PD over a one-year horizon which is considered equivalent to a credit assessment of credit quality step 3 of the Eurosystem harmonised rating scale).

It shall not include facilities where there is no genuine trade execution or arranging taking place in the system, such as bulletin boards used for advertising buying and selling interests, other entities aggregating or pooling potential buying or selling interests, or electronic post-trade confirmation services.

The request is accompanied by the conclusions of the independent national authority, Konkurrensverket (4) (the Swedish Competition Authority), whose main comments and conclusions are as follows: ‘Konkurrensverket does not have any decisive objections against the way in which [Sweden Post] has delimited the relevant markets (.) The picture of an existing and increasing competition against [Sweden Post] from new companies within the postal sector is correct, this applies in particular to the more densely populated areas (.) Sweden is however thinly populated with large geographical areas within which it will currently ...[+++]and probably for the foreseeable future not be commercially interesting for new companies to establish themselves [i. e. to provide postal services].

I believe the federal government's financial consolidation policy, which many await with waning patience, should clearly reflect the public interest considerations and be free of any form of political interference.

In the 2003 response to the reports of both parliamentary committees regarding the public interest implications of large bank mergers, the federal government identified several key issues it wanted to be considered before finalizing a financial sector consolidation policy in Canada.

We, in the official opposition, had fought hard at that time because we felt the government was taking the opportunity to make official its new Department of Human Resources Development, which brings together services that existed previously in other departments and which will manage half of the available budget once the interest on the debt has been paid.