Traduction de «Règlement définitif d'un litige » (Français → Anglais) :

A Commission report on the European Small Claims Procedure published today, finds that the upper limit of €2 000 for filing a claim excludes too many low-value disputes, particularly disputes involving small and medium-sized enterprises.

4. Alternative dispute resolution entities which have been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 17(2) of Directive .././EU [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] and which, according to the elements necessary to establish their competence, as notified pursuant to Article 16(1)(g) of Directive .././EU [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on al ...[+++]ternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)], which, based on the information contained in the electronic complaint form referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3, are competent to deal with disputes covered by this Regulation, shall register electronically with the ODR platform.

This Regulation shall apply to the out-of-court resolution of contractual disputes arising from the cross-border online sale of goods or provision of services between consumers and traders through the intervention of an alternative dispute resolution entity complying with Directive [Office of Publications please insert number of Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR)] and involving the use of a European online dispute resolution platform.

7. Notes that achieving a once-and-for-all settlement for defendants is desirable to reduce uncertainty and exaggerated economic effects that are capable of impacting on employees, suppliers, subcontractors and other innocent parties; calls for possible introduction of a settlement procedure for mass claims that can be initiated either by the parties before taking legal action or that can be ordered by the court before which an action is brought, with the aim of settling the dispute out-of-court by seeking judicial approval of a settlement agreement that can be declared binding upon ...[+++] all the victims that have participated in the settlement procedure; stresses that such a procedure must not entail an undue prolongation of proceedings, nor promote the unfair settlement of claims; calls for the commission to seek ways of achieving greater certainty including evaluating whether any subsequent claimants should normally be expected to avail themselves of no more than the outcome of the mass settlement;

7. Notes that achieving a once-and-for-all settlement for defendants is desirable to reduce uncertainty and exaggerated economic effects that are capable of impacting on employees, suppliers, subcontractors and other innocent parties; calls for an evaluation and a possible introduction of an out-of-court settlement procedure for mass claims that can either be initiated by the parties before taking legal action or that can be ordered by the court before which an action is brought; considers that such a settlement procedure should aim for an out-of-court settlement of the dispute, subject to seeking judicial approval of a settlement agre ...[+++]ement, which can be declared binding upon all the victims who have participated in the settlement procedure; stresses that such a procedure must neither entail an undue prolongation of proceedings, nor promote the unfair settlement of claims; calls for the Commission to seek ways of achieving greater certainty including evaluating whether any subsequent claimants should, in principle, be expected to benefit from no more than the outcome of such a settlement procedure;

7. Notes that achieving a once-and-for-all settlement for defendants is desirable to reduce uncertainty and exaggerated economic effects that are capable of impacting on employees, suppliers, subcontractors and other innocent parties; calls for an evaluation and a possible introduction of an out-of-court settlement procedure for mass claims that can either be initiated by the parties before taking legal action or that can be ordered by the court before which an action is brought; considers that such a settlement procedure should aim for an out-of-court settlement of the dispute, subject to seeking judicial approval of a settlement agre ...[+++]ement, which can be declared binding upon all the victims who have participated in the settlement procedure; stresses that such a procedure must neither entail an undue prolongation of proceedings, nor promote the unfair settlement of claims; calls for the Commission to seek ways of achieving greater certainty including evaluating whether any subsequent claimants should, in principle, be expected to benefit from no more than the outcome of such a settlement procedure;