Traduction de «Régime de priorités pour les projets d'immobilisations » (Français → Anglais) :

26. Underscores the need for more coordinated support schemes for renewables, in accordance with the ‘European Commission guidance for the design of renewables support schemes’, and more intra-EU trade in renewable electricity, for example through projects such as the North Sea Grid; calls on the Commission to ensure a level playing field for renewables within the EU and to put more emphasis on decentralised production and self-consumption of renewable electricity so as to provide a clear investment signal for sustainable energy forms, by maximising the potential of available EU funds in particular through the future European Fund for S ...[+++]trategic Investments, for strategic infrastructure projects and environmentally sustainable projects, expansion of renewable energy and resource efficiency; stresses that the Energy Union should prioritise market-based instruments for the promotion of low-emissions energy; calls for a functioning single market, especially for sustainable renewable energy;

Some of the issues to be considered include how the various elements of the Canadian Forces such as the navy decide their equipment needs; how the department determines the priority given to the various capital projects it undertakes; the role of the Minister of National Defence in guiding the choice of priorities made by the department and in obtaining the approval of capital projects by the Cabinet; and the impact of government budgetary decisions on how military capital projects are funded.

In the Hague Programme of 4 and 5 November 2004, the European Council set a series of objectives and priorities with a view to further developing the Common European Asylum System in its second phase.

With regard to amendment BQ-95, Bill C-25 replicates the existing priority regime for ministers' senior staff, which does not provide this kind of discretion.

The amendment made to the bill aimed to avoid a conflict between the Correctional Services Act and existing federal legislation, which already sets out priority systems in certain cases and provides for the payment or reimbursement of debts.

The Commission started the examination procedure under state aid provisions because the Danish authorities had not been able to provide, over a long period, any information on how the proposed scheme would be implemented, making it impossible to decide whether it was in conformity with Community law (legal basis; aims of the scheme; technical reasons justifying the laying-up of the vessels; rate of aid; conditions on granting the aid).