Traduction de «chef d'accusation » (Français → Anglais) :

lesser included offence

make a final determination in respect of the charges

count (on x -s of murder)

Definition: Negative parental behaviour specifically focused on the child as an individual, persistent over time and pervasive over several child behaviours (e.g. automatically blaming the child for any problems in the household or attributing negative characteristics to the child).

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (plea bargaining)

Prosecution Chamber

The requesting authority could also have moved to impose the disputed claim sooner than six years and six months after the plaintiff was acquitted of the criminal charges brought against him, particularly given that Directive 2010/24 contains a time bar with respect to requests for assistance, and which might be viewed as implying a due diligence obligation on requesting Member States.

The right to a fair trial for children who are subject to criminal proceedings implies the protection of privacy, the right to be informed about the charges and the proceedings in a way which is adapted to the child’s age and maturity, legal assistance and legal representation.

whereas on 3 May 2016 the Phnom Penh Municipal Court summoned Kem Sokha regarding a charge of criminal defamation, along with MPs Pin Ratana and Tok Vanchan, notwithstanding the fact that they enjoy immunity.

Is a national law compatible with the obligation of a Member State to provide for the effective prosecution of criminal offences by customs officials if that law provides for criminal proceedings brought against customs officials — for participation in a conspiracy to commit corruption offences while performing their professional duties (accepting bribes for non-performance of customs inspections), and for specific bribery offences and concealment of bribes received — to be terminated, without the court having examined the charges brought, under the following conditions: (a) two years have elapsed since the accused was charged; (b) the accused has lodged a request for the pre-trial investigation to be concluded; (c) the court has given th ...[+++]e prosecutor a period of three months to conclude the pre-trial investigation; (d) during that period, the prosecutor has committed ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’ (failure properly to notify a supplementary charge, failure to disclose the investigation file, contradictory indictment); (e) the court has given the prosecutor a further period of one month to remedy those ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’; ([f]) the prosecutor has failed to remedy the ‘infringements of essential procedural requirements’ within that time-limit — albeit that the infringements committed within the first three-month period and the failure to remedy them within the subsequent one-month period are attributable both to the prosecutor (failure to remove contradictions in the indictment; failure to take real action for most of those periods) and also to the defence (breach of the duty to cooperate with respect to notification of the charge and inspection of the investigation file due to the hospitalisation of the accused and claims regarding the lawyers’ other professional commitments); ([g]) the accused has acquired a subjective right to the termination of the criminal proceedings on account of the failure to reme ...