Traduction de «déroulement de l'évaluation » (Français → Anglais) :

evaluate breastfeeding activity | monitor breastfeeding activity | assess course of breast-feeding periods | assess the course of breast-feeding period

vertical stop-cylinder flatbed machine | vertical stop-cylinder flatbed press | vertical stop-cylinder machine | vertical stop-cylinder press

continuous cloth towel [ continuous towel | continuous hand towel ]

continuous cloth towel cabinet [ continuous towel cabinet | continuous linen towel cabinet | continuous hand towel cabinet ]

work flow | workflow | working flow

vertical stop-cylinder flatbed press [ vertical stop-cylinder press | vertical stop-cylinder machine | vertical stop-cylinder flatbed machine ]

rolling title | creeping title | crawl title

mistrial

business evaluator | chartered appraiser | business valuer | chartered business valuator

capture ICT knowledge | assess ICT knowledge | capture IT knowledge

It takes place in 3 phases throughout the year: technical, which involves the incident detection, investigation, mitigation and information exchanges (completed in April); operational/tactical, dealing with alerting, crisis assessment, cooperation, coordination, tactical analysis, advice and information exchanges at operational level (today and early 2015); strategic, which examines decision making, political impact and public affairs.

2. Emphasises that, if the harmonious development of the Union and the smooth functioning of Union programmes is to be ensured, these structures need modern administrative and management capacities in order to formulate informed and interlinked forward-looking strategies, which should also include issues specific to the regions, and thereby contribute to the quality and effectiveness of different policies in various fields; stresses that the existing decision-making mechanisms and administrative processes should be assessed with a view to establishing whether the administration needs to be modernised; points out, however, that any incr ...[+++]ease in capacity should not involve the creation of new mechanisms or institutions but that existing administrative processes should be used more effectively as part of forward-looking strategies; takes the view that, if the harmonious development of the Union and the smooth functioning of Union programmes is to be ensured, the Member States require modern administrative and management capacities; takes the view that particular attention should be paid to Member States which record delays and low absorption rates over the programming period 2007-2013;

Question No. 980 Ms. Françoise Boivin: With regard to Bill C-10, An Act to enact the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act and to amend the State Immunity Act, the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and other Acts: (a) what has the Department of Justice identified as the policy objectives or desired outcomes of Bill C-10 and what indicator has been identified to measure progress; (b) what has the Department identified as the overall legal costs for defending Bill C-10 from legal challenges; (c) when assessing the compliance of Bill C-10 with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms under section 4 of the De ...[+++]partment of Justice Act, what measures were used to assess whether delays in trial processes and prison overcrowding would violate Charter-guaranteed rights; (d) what is the measure of post-sentence recidivism rates used now by the Department of Public Safety, and how is the success of Bill C-10 to be defined and measured; (e) what are the numbers of Aboriginal, women, addicted, cognitively-impaired or mentally-ill offenders in remand or federal custody facilities that are being used as a base against which to assess whether Bill C-10 increases or decreases those numbers; and (f) how is the government assessing benefits to victims of crime resulting from Bill C-10?

(Return tabled) Question No. 869 Ms. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet: With regard to the Direct Lending Program of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, for each fiscal year from 2005-2006 to 2012-2013: (a) what was the total annual expenditure; (b) how many projects received loans annually; (c) what proportion of projects were for First Nations projects and what proportion were for social housing projects; (d) how many new units of housing were constructed annually; (e) broken down by year, how many applications for funding were (i) presented, (ii) accepted, (iii) denied; (f) how long were applications accepted for each year; (g) on which date were decisions for funding made each year; (h) what criteria were used to decide where fund ...[+++]ing will be allocated and who made the decision; (i) at what stage of the construction project were funds paid out; (j) how many projects did not reach that stage of construction by the end of fiscal year 2010-2011 and what happened to their funding; (k) what are the reporting requirements once funds have been received; (l) what happens with the funds from repaid loans; and (m) how many loans have defaulted (Return tabled) Question No. 870 Ms. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet: With regard to the working group with representatives from the provinces, territories and the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation that is charged with examining the financial viability of the existing social housing stock as operating agreements expire: (a) with regard to its membership and its mandate, (i) who determines the group’s membership, (ii) how many people are on the working group, (iii) what are the names and official titles of each person currently sitting on the working group, which province or territory are they from and what organization do they represent, (iv) what are the names and official titles of each person who previously sat on the working group, which province or territory are they from and what organization did they represent, (v) wh ...