Traduction de «efficacement les profils » (Français → Anglais) :

EMPHASISES that a combination of public finance including innovative sources and private sources, alongside increased lending and leveraging by financial institutions is essential for mobilising USD 100 billion per year by 2020 in the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation as determined in the Cancun Agreements, including to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), adaptation, technology development and transfer and capacity building, while recognizing it comes at an opportunity cost; ACKNOWLEDGES the important role of Multilateral Development Banks and other public financial institutions, including the EIB in facilitating the mobilisation of these flows; REAFFIRMS the role o ...[+++]f the private sector in providing finance for climate-related investments in developing countries and STRESSES that this role should be strengthened by further efforts to address regulatory barriers and to develop policy frameworks necessary to leverage private climate finance, including an efficient international carbon market; in this context HIGHLIGHTS that a robust carbon market is required, which drives the carbon price necessary for low-carbon investment, to achieve global mitigation objectives in an efficient way and to support the level of private and public sources required; UNDERLINES that a stable, attractive and competitive risk – return profile of climate relevant investments is a prerequisite to mobilize private sector capital. ACKNOWLEDGES the importance of developing and implementing cost-effective and non-distortive tools in cooperation with relevant private sector actors in order to leverage private capital at scale.

In order to address the potentially detrimental effect of poorly designed remuneration structures on the sound management of risk and control of risk-taking behaviour by individuals, there should be an express obligation for AIFM to establish and maintain, for those categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on their risk profile or the risk profiles of AIF they manage, remuneration policies and practices that are consistent with effective risk management.

43. Expresses serious concern that the "governance profiles" developed by the Commission for each ACP country, which will guide programming for development assistance in relation to the EUR 2,700,000,000 additional funds under the 10th EDF, have been prepared without any participatory element; notes that eligibility for additional funds of beneficiary countries has been judged according to a set of criteria relating to such issues as migration, trade liberalisation and the fight against terrorism, with only one criterion directly lin ...[+++]ked to the MDGs; expresses dismay that the Commission's "profiles" risk hollowing out the APRM process and that, only after the programming of the additional fund is over, does the Commission propose to launch, outside the APRM process, a "Governance Forum", and that "in order to facilitate more effective support to the Pan-African governance architecture (.) the EU will explore new avenues to pull Community and Member States funding"; calls on the Commission to consult and inform the European Parliament and the Council on the follow-up and the implementation of these funds in order to make sure they are allocated to governance initiatives, to support the AU governance agenda and the APRM process;

43. Expresses serious concern that the ‘governance profiles’ developed by the Commission for each ACP country, which will guide programming for development assistance in relation to the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF, have been prepared without any participatory element; notes that the eligibility for additional funds of beneficiary countries has been judged by a set of criteria relating to such issues as migration, trade liberalisation and the fight against terrorism, with only one criterion directly linked to t ...[+++]he MDGs; expresses dismay that the Commission's ‘profiles’ risk hollowing out the APRM process and that, only after the programming of the additional fund is over, the Commission proposes to launch, outside the APRM process, a “Governance Forum”, and that “in order to facilitate more effective support to the Pan-African governance architecture (.) the EU will explore new avenues to pull Community and Member States funding”; asks the Commission to consult and inform the European Parliament and the Council on the follow-up and the implementation of these funds in order to make sure they are allocated to governance initiatives, to support the AU governance agenda and the APRM process;

The missing persons definition subcommittee reviewed the resources and police procedures that already exist and focused on what guidelines would be required to ensure the most effective management of missing persons cases when these profiles were included in a national MPI. The legal, administrative, and privacy issues subcommittee focused its research on analyzing the various legal issues involved in an MPI. These included issues such as the implications of cross-matching the MPI with the national DNA data bank's criminal indexes; ...[+++] informed consent; legislative jurisdiction; legal guarantees relating to analysis, retention, use, and destruction of biological samples and DNA profiles; and so on.

These include how to work with stakeholders more effectively to develop client profiles, undertaking comprehensive analysis of the impacts on all stakeholders, addressing small business interests, and conducting effective public consultations and negotiations.