Traduction de «la compagnie d'assurance pohjola limitée » (Français → Anglais) :

There is still a threshold there for the bank and the insurance company to prove that their purpose is indeed the retention of historically interesting information.

3. For any claim up to the amount of EUR 220 000 per passenger , a bus and/or coach undertaking shall not exclude or limit its liability by proving that it has taken the care required pursuant to paragraph 4( a) , unless the total amount of the resulting claim exceeds the amount for which compulsory insurance is, in conformity with Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles , required u ...[+++]nder the national legislation of the Member state in which the bus or coach is normally based. In such a situation, liability shall be limited to that amount .

42. Insists on the need for more transparency and for stricter user-oriented provisions concerning the choice of ground handlers for restricted services; insists, in particular, that the possibility of establishing additional rules concerning the Airport Users' Committee be considered, consisting, for example, of the obligation to give reasons as to why the choice made by the airport does not follow the opinion of the Committee; notes that such a decision could also, in this case, be passed on to an authority independent of the airport's managing body; lastly, suggests that the Commission consider, in any future proposal for the amendment of Directive 96/67/EC, whether airlines already operating ground ha ...[+++]ndling services in the airport through third-party handlers should be excluded from voting in the selection of any new entrant;

42. Insists on the need for more transparency and for stricter user-oriented provisions concerning the choice of ground handlers for restricted services; insists, in particular, that the possibility of establishing additional rules concerning the Airport Users' Committee be considered, consisting, for example, of the obligation to give reasons as to why the choice made by the airport does not follow the opinion of the Committee; notes that such a decision could also, in this case, be passed on to an authority independent of the airport's managing body; lastly, suggests that the Commission consider, in any future proposal for the amendment of Directive 96/67/EC, whether airlines already operating ground ha ...[+++]ndling services in the airport through third-party handlers should be excluded from voting in the selection of any new entrant;