Traduction de «moyen d'irrecevabilité » (Français → Anglais) :

exception to dismiss action

peremptory plea [ plea in bar of trial | plea in bar | defense in bar | bar defense | objection at law | litis contestation negative | objection to admissibility ]

fall due to collision of pedestrian (conveyance) with another pedestrian (conveyance)

Definition: In typical mild, moderate, or severe depressive episodes, the patient suffers from lowering of mood, reduction of energy, and decrease in activity. Capacity for enjoyment, interest, and concentration is reduced, and marked tiredness after even minimum effort is common. Sleep is usually disturbed and appetite diminished. Self-esteem and self-confidence are almost always reduced and, even in the mild form, some ideas of guilt or worthlessness are often present. The lowered mood varies little from day to day, is unresponsive to circumstances and may be accompanied by so-called somatic symptoms, such as loss of interest and pleas ...[+++]urable feelings, waking in the morning several hours before the usual time, depression worst in the morning, marked psychomotor retardation, agitation, loss of appetite, weight loss, and loss of libido. Depending upon the number and severity of the symptoms, a depressive episode may be specified as mild, moderate or severe. | single episodes of:depressive reaction | psychogenic depression | reactive depression

managed medium term objectives | oversee medium term objectives | manage medium term objectives | manage objectives of medium term

mean time to repair | MTTR [Abbr.]

Long Run Average Incremental Cost | LRAIC [Abbr.]

Notification of Ineligibility (A46.4(1)(a)) and Notification to the RD (A46.4(1)(b))

Tuberculosis of lung, confirmed by unspecified means

Appeals — Pleas in law — Inadmissibility of an application at first instance — Plea involving a question of public policy — Considered of Court’s own motion

The first ground of this appeal alleges that no reasons were given for deeming the action before the General Court inadmissible; therefore, paragraph 58 of the order under appeal breaches the general principle that there is a duty to state the reasons on which measures are based and, more specifically, infringes Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal erroneously declared as inadmissible the plea of infringement of Article 5(5) of the Staff Regulations (1) with its specific legal conditions providing that not just equal, but, in fact, ‘identical conditions of recruitment and service career shall apply to all officials’.

OHIM contends, as its principal argument, that the second ground of appeal is inadmissible in so far as the appellant merely reproduces verbatim a plea in law previously submitted to, and rejected by, the Court of First Instance, without criticising the response of that Court.