Traduction de «prix d'exercice » (Français → Anglais) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 324 Hon. Gerry Byrne: With regard to the administration of all government departments, crown corporations and agencies as well as other entities within federal jurisdiction that offer goods or services to parliamentarians, to parliamentarians' staff, to the spouses or dependents of parliamentarians, or more generally to the offices of parliamentarians, hereafter referred to as “eligible parliamentary persons”, at either no cost or at a reduced cost compared to the rate normally charged to a member of the general public who might seek the provision of the same or a similar good or service from the government: ...[+++]without consideration or inclusion of any occasional discounts or promotions for fiscal years 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012, and 2012-2013, and not including those goods or services provided directly to any eligible parliamentary persons under the normal rules of the administration of the House of Commons, the Senate or by the Library of Parliament, (a) which federal entities provided goods or services to those eligible parliamentary persons at either no cost or at a reduced cost; (b) what is each respective good or service thus provided, and what is the rationale for offering such no-cost goods or services or discounts to eligible parliamentary persons; (c) broken down by each such individual product or service, what is the cost to each federal entity, as measured in revenue that would otherwise not have been lost, of providing such goods or services to eligible parliamentary persons, calculated for each fiscal year and using the undiscounted rate that would be normally charged to members of the general public as the comparative basis for such a calculation; (d) what was the net financial position of each federal crown corporation or operating agency providing such goods or services before the provision of federal subsidies are considered in each fiscal year?

9. Recalls the agreement within the MFF, which is being implemented for the first time in the 2014 budget, to frontload commitments for specified policy objectives relating to youth employment, research, Erasmus+ (in particular for apprenticeships) and SMEs; emphasises that, as part of the MFF agreement, a similar approach needs to be taken for the 2015 budget through the frontloading of the Youth Employment Initiative (EUR 871.4 million in 2011 prices) as well as of Erasmus+ and COSME (EUR 20 million each in 2011 prices); is particularly concerned about the funding of the Youth Employment Initiative after 2015 and requests that all fu ...[+++]nding possibilities, including the global MFF margin for commitments, be considered for this purpose;

8. Recalls the agreement within the MFF, which is being implemented for the first time in the 2014 budget, to frontload commitments for specified policy objectives relating to youth employment, research, Erasmus+ (in particular for apprenticeships) and SMEs; emphasises that, as part of the MFF agreement, a similar approach needs to be taken for the 2015 budget through the frontloading of the Youth Employment Initiative (EUR 871,4 million in 2011 prices) as well as of Erasmus+ and COSME (EUR 20 million each in 2011 prices); is particularly concerned about the funding of the Youth Employment Initiative after 2015 and requests that all fu ...[+++]nding possibilities, including the global MFF margin for commitments, be considered for this purpose;

– (DE) Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, when our farmers read in the press that we in the European Parliament are debating agricultural prices for the 2000/2001 financial year, many will certainly cherish the hope that we might just be considering a few price increases.

FINANCING OF LOW-COST HOUSING FOR PERSONS EMPLOYED IN THE ECSC INDUSTRIES The Council gave its assent under the second paragraph of Article 54 of the ECSC Treaty to the granting of loans within the framework of the twelfth programme of low-cost housing for persons employed in the ECSC industries (Financial year 1993 - ECU 19 million and financial year 1994 - ECU 17 million). ---------------- ANNEX PROVISIONS ON MONITORING Commission's information requirements (a) Capacity reductions - date (or expected date) of cessation of production - date (or expected date) of dismantling (1) of the installation concerned - where installation is sold, date (or expected date) of sale, identity and country of purchaser - sale ...[+++]price (b) Investments - details of investments realised - date of completion - the costs of the investment, the sources of finance and the sum of any related aid involved - the date of aid payment (1) As defined in Commission Decision No 3010/91/ECSC - OJ L 286, 16.10.1991, p. 20 (c) Workforce reductions - number and timing of job losses - the total costs - a breakdown of how the costs are being financed (d) Production and market effects - monthly production of crude steel and finished products per category - products sold, including volumes, prices and markets (e) Financial performance - evolution of selected key financial ratios to ensure progress is being made towards viability (the financial results and ratios must be provided in a way allowing comparisons to the company's financial restructuring plan) - level of financial charges - details and timing of aids received and costs covered - terms and conditions of any new loans (irrespective of source) (f) Privatisation - selling price and treatment of existing liabilities - disposal of proceeds of sale - date of sale - financial position of company at time of sale (g) Creation of new company or of new facilities corresponding to an extension of capacities - identity of each private and public sector particip ...

The Commission found that the aid submitted for approval by the UK Government in January is compatible with the proper functioning of the common market because: - supply difficulties are unlikely in 1988/89 in view of the high level of coal and coke stocks; _ deliveries of British coal to other Commmunity countries are unlikely to rise during the current financial year; - no price alignment on other Community producers is likely; - British coal prices should not, in principle, be a form of indirect aid to industrial users.