Traduction de «projet d'enseignement intégré dans l'artibonite » (Français → Anglais) :

20. Believes that, in order fully to address high and growing unemployment, especially among young people and persons with disabilities, as well as growing inequalities and widespread poverty, the EU needs a new and ambitious social agenda within a 2020 strategy, based on high-quality full employment, social inclusion and the fight against poverty; calls for this new social agenda within the strategy to be guided by a set of ambitious targets for poverty reduction, including for children and the elderly, as well as for in-work poverty, early school-leaving and the number of young people who are neither in work nor in education or training, and for increasing participation in lifelong learning, in order to drive effective ...[+++]progress in these crucial fields; insists here on the use of the relative poverty rate in the setting of EU and national targets in this area;

35. Notes the fundamental role of educational programming and structures in promoting inclusiveness and reducing inter-ethnic tensions; consequently, calls on the Western Balkan governments to improve the quality of education by including civic, human and democratic rights as fundamental European values in the relevant curricula and to put an end to segregation in schools; points out that the teaching of history in schools and universities in the Western Balkans must be based on documented research and must reflect the different perspectives of the various national and ethnic groups in the region if lasting results are to be achieved in promoting reconciliation and improving inter-ethnic relations; fully supports initiatives, such as the Join ...[+++]t History Project of the Center for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe, aimed at writing and disseminating joint history-teaching materials that provide a multi-perspective account of Balkan history, and calls on the competent ministries, educational authorities and educational establishments in the region to endorse the use of joint history teaching materials; calls on the Commission to support such initiatives financially and politically;

35. Notes the fundamental role of educational programming and structures in promoting inclusiveness and reducing inter-ethnic tensions; consequently, calls on the Western Balkan governments to improve the quality of education by including civic, human and democratic rights as fundamental European values in the relevant curricula and to put an end to segregation in schools; points out that the teaching of history in schools and universities in the Western Balkans must be based on documented research and must reflect the different perspectives of the various national and ethnic groups in the region if lasting results are to be achieved in promoting reconciliation and improving inter-ethnic relations; fully supports initiatives, such as the Join ...[+++]t History Project of the Center for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe, aimed at writing and disseminating joint history-teaching materials that provide a multi-perspective account of Balkan history, and calls on the competent ministries, educational authorities and educational establishments in the region to endorse the use of joint history teaching materials; calls on the Commission to support such initiatives financially and politically;

82. Takes account of the recent measures to facilitate naturalisation of the many non-citizens living in Latvia; welcomes the fact that the Social Integration Foundation has now become operational; considers, however, that its current modest budget should be raised and concentrated on inter-ethnic integration projects; notes with satisfaction that the OSCE has closed its mission in Riga as Latvia has made sufficient progress; suggests that Latvia study the possibility of continuing to provide access to upper secondary level educat ...[+++]ion in Russian beyond 2004; is convinced that efforts to achieve greater integration for the Russian-speaking minority must be sustained for a number of years and, therefore, encourages Latvia to indicate its intentions for the longer term; hopes that Latvia will promptly ratify the Council of Europe"s Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities;

72. Takes account of the recent measures to facilitate naturalisation of the many non-citizens living in Latvia; welcomes the fact that the Social Integration Foundation has now become operational; considers, however, that its current modest budget should be raised and concentrated on inter-ethnic integration projects; notes with satisfaction that the OSCE has closed its mission in Riga as Latvia has made sufficient progress; suggests that Latvia study the possibility of continuing to provide access to upper secondary level educat ...[+++]ion in Russian beyond 2004; is convinced that efforts to achieve greater integration for the Russian-speaking minority must be sustained for a number of years and, therefore, encourages Latvia to indicate its intentions for the longer term; hopes that Latvia will promptly ratify the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities;

The programme has four main Actions. These are: Action 1 - Erasmus Mundus Masters Courses, comprising integrated courses at masters level offered by at least three universities in three different European countries; Action 2 - Erasmus Mundus scholarships for students and scholars from third countries; Action 3 - Partnerships with higher education institutions in third countries, comprising scholarships for students and scholars from EU countries for mobility towards third countries; Action 4 - Projects to enhance the worldwide attractiveness of European higher education.