Traduction de «redevance pour travaux d'amélioration » (Français → Anglais) :

(65) In order to ensure the provision of certain information for monitoring the rail market, to define certain details of the network statement, to define the direct costs of a train service, to define certain criteria for noise-differentiated infrastructure charges, to define certain criteria for a temporary reduction for ETCS, to define certain criteria of a performance scheme, to set out the details of the criteria to be followed regarding the setting up of requirements with regard to applicants, to define the schedule for the process of allocating capacity, to define the details of the regulatory accounts to be provided to the regulatory body and to develop regulatory bodies' common criteria and practices for decision-making pursuant to this Direc ...[+++]tive, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the criteria and procedure to be followed as the scope of market monitoring, certain elements of the network statement, certain principles of charging, the temporary reduction for ETCS, certain elements of the performance scheme, the criteria to be followed for the requirements with regard to applicants for infrastructure, the schedule for the allocation process, the regulatory accounts and common principles and practices for making decision developed by regulatory bodies.

The amount of the fee should take into account the complexity of the work involved.

A proportion of the fees and charges collected by the Agency should be transferred to the competent authorities of the Member States to compensate them for the work of the rapporteurs of the committees of the Agency and, as appropriate, for other tasks provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

In order to improve the efficiency of the charging scheme and to reduce the administrative and accounting workload, Member States should be able to collect en route charges collectively within a joint route charges system through a single charge per flight.

11. Stresses that the regulatory framework should include a maximum list of absolutely essential conditions to be attached to general authorisations; observes, moreover, that national regulatory authorities must continue to be empowered to obtain business data from operators and must procedurally be able to do so; believes that rights of way do not justify specific authorisation, since this kind of right is not specific to an individual organisation; believes further, that the use of spectrum does not justify individual licences when there is no risk of harmful interference, in particular when spectrum assignment has been harmonised at European level; considers that guidelines to benchmark ...[+++]fee levels could be useful in bringing greater consistency to licence fees across the EU; is concerned to note that the Commission does not discourage spectrum auctions, since auctions tend to raise licence fees above their economic value, raise consumer tariffs and hamper the introduction of new services; encourages the Member States to use the revenues raised as a result of auctions, fees and radio spectrum pricing to create better conditions for the development of an information society and e-commerce in the European Union, in accordance with the conclusions of the Lisbon Summit;

7. Notes the wide variation in the wireless communication market and licensing regime across the EU, and the importance to the EU's global competitiveness of the successful future development of this sector; suggests that a unified approach to licensing would be valuable, with the objective of improving market operation and spectrum availability; regrets that the Commission did not include in the report any figures on fees for the use of radio frequencies; points out that the fees for licences and authorisations should cover only justified and relevant administrative costs, that the use of radio spectrum should be subject only to such ...[+++] charges and fees that are necessary to cover the costs of the radio spectrum management and that consideration should be given to reinvesting licence revenues in spectrum management; except in special circumstances, radio frequencies should not be auctioned, since it has a negative effect on user fees and the spread and development of communications services;