Traduction de «régime d'actionnariat des salariés » (Français → Anglais) :

That's a couple of more significant digits than you could probably put on that, but over 10 years, that's 26% extra growth attributed to ESOPs. ESOP companies paid in Washington State 5% to 12% higher than non-ESOP companies, and they had about three times better retirement benefits.

25. Acknowledges that business succession, additional funding, staff retention and other problems characteristic of SMEs can be alleviated by employee share ownership plans; is of the opinion that employee ownership schemes in small and micro enterprises can be combined with labour market measures, such as unemployment benefits, and thus help to reinstate the unemployed;

26. Notes that there is a lack of information and education about possible employee ownership schemes, especially among SMEs; calls on the Commission and the Member States in this regard to better organise information campaigns and to encourage the cross-border transferability of best practice schemes among Member States.

6. Stresses that further transparency is needed in national employee ownership schemes and especially in calculating the effective tax burden across the EU-28 in order to prevent double taxation and discrimination;

18. Points out that employee ownership fosters much-needed social cohesion and serves as an important addition to sustainable corporate governance; stresses, nonetheless, the need to take precautions when promoting ownership schemes so as not to substitute wages with profit-sharing systems;

20. Calls for sustainable long-term remuneration policies which should be based on the long-term functioning of the individual and his company; is of the view that inclusion of stock options as part of remuneration schemes should be minimised; supports, however, the promotion of voluntary employee share ownership schemes, carefully assessed so as to avoid exposure to risks from lack of diversification for employees, and open to all employees within a company; considers that employee share ownership should enable employees to share in the profits, but may not, under any circumstances, replace their wages or salaries or hinder collectiv ...[+++]e bargaining;