Traduction de «approche réglementée » (Français → Anglais) :

Member States should carry out inspections, taking a risk-based approach in order to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Regulation and thus targeting those activities representing the highest risk of illegal trade or emission of controlled substances.

Based on this assessment the Communication recommends a regulated market-based approach, corresponding to the Impact Assessment’s option 2, which reflects current knowledge and seeks to prepare the way for future developments.

This activity is highly regulated and common approaches are necessary to improve the efficiency of the market.

The work on non regulated professions should therefore continue and new initiatives be developed in areas such as language skills or appropriate training prior to mobility which form part of the new global approach put forward in the 2006 Annual Progress Report. The latter calls for a new partnership between the Commission and the Member States in order to meet the global challenges of more and better jobs.

These include telecommunications (encompassing all communication networks) which is being regulated and deregulated at the same time, the largely unregulated computer industry [19], the Internet which has functioned mainly on the basis of a 'hands off' approach and e-commerce which is increasingly subject to specific regulation. In relation to security, provisions regarding third-party liability, cyber-crime, electronic signatures, data protection and export regulations are relevant.

Possible main features of a Community regime are outlined, including: no retroactivity (application to future damage only); coverage of both environmental damage (site contamination and damage to biodiversity) and traditional damage (harm to health and property); a closed scope of application linked with EC environmental legislation: contaminated sites and traditional damage to be covered only if caused by an EC regulated hazardous or potentially hazardous activity; damage to biodiversity only if protected under the Natura 2000 network; strict liability for damage caused by inherently dangerous activities, fault-based liability for damage to biodiversity caused by a non-dangerous activity; [1] commonly accepted defences, some alleviati ...[+++]on of the plaintiffs' burden of proof and some equitable relief for defendants; liability focused on the operator in control of the activity which caused the damage; criteria for assessing and dealing with the different types of damage; an obligation to spend compensation paid by the polluter on environmental restoration; an approach to enhanced access to justice in environmental damage cases; co-ordination with international conventions; financial security for potential liabilities, working with the markets.