Traduction de «cas de non-communication » (Français → Anglais) :

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

Definition: This category includes certain disorders of behaviour that are not classifiable under other categories. They are characterized by repeated acts that have no clear rational motivation, cannot be controlled, and generally harm the patient's own interests and those of other people. The patient reports that the behaviour is associated with impulses to action. The cause of these disorders is not understood and they are grouped together because of broad descriptive similarities, not because they are known to share any other important features.

Definition: A chronic stage in the development of a schizophrenic illness in which there has been a clear progression from an early stage to a later stage characterized by long- term, though not necessarily irreversible, negative symptoms, e.g. psychomotor slowing; underactivity; blunting of affect; passivity and lack of initiative; poverty of quantity or content of speech; poor nonverbal communication by facial expression, eye contact, voice modulation and posture; poor self-care and social performance. | Chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia Restzustand (schizophrenic) Schizophrenic residual state

informal access request [ informal request ]

generic chip

non-pooled

non-financial reporting | non-financial information

European Joint Undertaking [ ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking | BBI Joint Undertaking | Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking | Clean Sky Joint Undertaking | ECSEL Joint Undertaking | ENIAC Joint Undertaking | FCH Joint Undertaking | FCH JU | Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking | IMI Joint Undertaking | S2R Joint Undertaking | S2R JU | SESAR Joint Undertaking | Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking ]

non-registered mutual fund

nonblocking internal communication

1. Applauds the fact that the EU has a legally binding framework, unique in the world, through which arms export control is being improved, including in crisis regions and countries with questionable human rights records, and welcomes the fact, in this connection, that European and non-European third countries have joined the arms exports control system on the basis of the Common Position; notes, however, that the eight criteria are applied and interpreted with varying degrees of rigour in the EU Member States; calls, therefore, for more uniform interpretation and implementation of the Common Position with all its obligations and regre ...[+++]ts that the EU still does not have a common policy on arms transfers to third countries;

4. Is concerned that the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts on the grounds that the error rate resulting from the ex post audits was 6,84%; takes note that the Joint Undertaking completed ex post audits covering EUR 2,2 million (18,8 % of accepted Joint Undertaking's contribution for the first call validated by the Joint Undertaking by June 2011); regrets that on the basis of the Joint Undertaking's first audits applying its own methodology, the detected error rate was 4,58 % while the residual ...[+++]error rate was 3,72 %; expects that the Court of Auditors and the Joint Undertaking agree on an audit methodology that for the same ex post audits delivers the same results; reiterates that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex ante controls, in particular for the grants management; requests that the discharge authority is informed of the results of the following ex post audit processes conducted by the Joint Undertaking;

4. Is concerned that the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts on the grounds that the error rate resulting from the ex-post audits was 6,84%; takes note that the Joint Undertaking completed ex-post audits covering 2,2 million euro (18,8 % of accepted Joint Undertaking's contribution for the first call validated by the Joint Undertaking by June 2011); regrets that based on Joint Undertaking first audits applying its own methodology the detected error rate was 4,58 % while the residual error rate wa ...[+++]s 3,72 %; expects that the Court and the Joint Undertaking agree on an audit methodology that for the same ex-post audits delivers the same results, reiterates that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex-ante controls in particular for the grant management, requests that the discharge authority is informed of the results of the following ex-post audit processes conducted by the Joint Undertaking;

Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) , Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) , Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) , Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ...[+++]of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (hereinafter together referred to as ‘the 2002 regulatory framework for electronic communications’) aim to create an internal market for electronic communications within the Union while ensuring a high level of consumer protection through enhanced competition.