Traduction de «commission d évaluation » (Français → Anglais) :

18. Recalls that monitoring and evaluation are basic and recurrent tasks of public administrations and that their systematic externalisation is incomprehensible and undesirable; stresses that, where the European Institutions feel that evaluations carried out by national and Community administrations, as well as by internal and external auditors, need to be supplemented by an external evaluation, the evaluation body must be selected on the basis of its skills and of its independence vis-à-vis the programme or the actions being evaluated; calls upon the Commission, therefor ...[+++]e, to phase out any "framework" contract concluded with external bodies for the evaluation of the current programmes and to refrain from hiring any external body on a repeated basis for the purpose of evaluation; urges the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to refrain from hiring, for evaluation purposes, any external body that has had a previous contractual relationship with the Commission for the designing, monitoring or evaluating of actions or measures involved in these programmes;

11. Considers evaluation to be a normal and systematic task of the Commission, as well as of the other institutions; however, external evaluations may be developed whenever deemed necessary, on a case-by-case basis; the independence of the chosen evaluator with regard to European institutions is a key element for these evaluations; invites the Commission, therefore, to end the practice of establishing so-called "framework contracts" and to evaluate the rationale of keeping existing ones;

I. Annual Plans: submit, for the first time, a summary by Directorate-General of all completed and outstanding tasks for 2000, since annual work plans for each of the 29 Directorates-General and job descriptions of all 59 officials who occupy A1 posts were not established for 1999, or for any prior year; welcomes that under Action 22 of the White paper on Reform, the Commission would carry out individual performance appraisals of A1 and A2 officials in April 2001; regrets substantial delays whereby the first appraisal will only start by the end of 2001, as stated in the Commission decision of 22 December 2000 on the appraisal, selecti ...[+++]on and appointment of senior Commission officials (SEC(2000) 2305 ); calls for the transmission of annual work plans and, on a confidential basis, appraisals of A1 officials; asks the Commission to inform Parliament of the number of officials that have left under Articles 50 and 51 of the Staff Regulations; calls on the Commission to take into account the staff appraisals; invites the Commission to implement measures that will allow it to dismiss A1 officials whose career development reports indicate that performance is inadequate ;

Clause 11(1) adds a reference to a Review Board in s. 672.2(2) of the Code so that, whether an assessment order is made by a court or Review Board, an assessment report must be filed within the period fixed by the court or Review Board.

Clause 11(1) adds a reference to a Review Board in s. 672.2(2) of the Code so that, whether an assessment order is made by a court or Review Board, an assessment report must be filed within the period fixed by the court or Review Board.

Clause 11(2) similarly adds a reference to a Review Board in s. 672.2(4) so that, whether an assessment order is made by a court or Review Board, the assessment report must be provided to the prosecutor, accused and accused’s counsel, minus any information that the court or Review Board determines should be withheld to protect the safety of another person or the treatment of the accused.