Traduction de «examen judiciaire » (Français → Anglais) :

17. Regrets the lack of transparency and a number of shortfalls and deficiencies in the judicial review procedure and in the appeal procedure concerning judges and prosecutors who have not been reappointed, including violations of procedures and standards, and the impact that these deficiencies might have on the independence of the judiciary, the separation of powers and the rule of law as well as the right to impartial treatment for all members of the judiciary, including those removed from office; calls on the authorities to ensure that the High Judicial Council acts transparently, independently and in full exercise of its powers, app ...[+++]lying consistent and firm criteria clearly laid down by law and without any external pressures; points to the need for a regular system of assessment of the performance of judges to ensure the continued quality of the judiciary after completion of the review;

D. whereas, according to credible reports (FIDH, Human Rights Watch), there are arguments showing that prosecutors and the Belarus Supreme Court held an unfair trial and that the investigation was marred by serious human rights abuses and intentional disregard of important evidence indicating the innocence of the two men and whereas, according to observers of the trial, there were serious procedural violations during the preliminary investigation and the judicial examination of the case;

Senator Smith: I am delighted to hear the honourable senator's answer because it seems to me if he is prepared to accept that proposal with this piece of legislation, then the Prime Minister's other legislation on Senate reform should also be attached to it, and we should have a judicial review from the Supreme Court of Canada on all of the legislation at once.

As Mr. McGuinty has suggested, that would make any decision to enter into an equivalency agreement much more open to judicial review, and once being judicially reviewed, a judge would have more rights to dig into the rationale for the agreement.

The Committee accordingly believes that the assistance of a special advocate is necessary in at least five contexts: judicial review of a decision to list a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code; [19] judicial consideration of a certificate having the effect of denying or revoking charitable status under the Charities Registration (Security Information) Act (CRSIA); applications under the Canada Evidence Act (CEA) with respect to the disclosure of information; applications under the CEA to vary or cancel a certificate issued by the Attorney General of Canada prohibiting the disclosure of information; and judicial consideration of a ...[+++] security certificate under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA).

She named the following: We have a judicial review; we have reports to Parliament; we have reviews by the Privacy Commissioner and the Information Commissioner; we have a three-year review; we have a sunset clause under preventive arrest and investigative hearing provisions; we have the RCMP Public Complaints Commission; and we have provincial complaints commissions.