Traduction de «pour leurs opinions » (Français → Anglais) :

opinion leader

non-expert opinion evidence

freedom of opinion [ freedom of thought ]

opinion poll [ audience rating | Gallup poll | public opinion poll | Questionnaires(ECLAS) ]

analyse business objectives and customer interests | collect customer feedback on applications

opinion census | opinion polls | opinion poll | opinions poll

manage public consultations | undertake public surveys | carry out public consultations | conduct public surveys

The Health of Canada's youth: views and behaviours of 11-, 13- and 15- year-olds from 11 countries

We heard from many people, and these were some of the comments we heard: Roman Catholic and Pentecostals who want reform but have no voice as their church bodies reflect an official position, and do not allow opportunity for individual expression; teachers in the Roman Catholic system who signed a petition in favour of reform, and wanted to circulate it in their schools but were afraid to for fear of losing their jobs; Roman Catholic and Pentecostal parents who signed the petition and encouraged us to continue because they have no way of expressing their views through their schools; elderly people who went to the trouble of voting in ...[+++]the referendum because they considered this to be such an important issue, and who now feel that their rights are being violated because the " yes" vote they cast is not being acted upon; Roman Catholic parents who refused to ever send their children to a school in the Roman Catholic system; parents of the non-affiliated religions in this province whose rights under the current system are nonexistent; parents of children within the Roman Catholic system who have been asked to sign and send back to their schools forms stating whether or not they would prefer to stay in the Roman Catholic system, parents who have told us that they have felt intimidated by this and have signed agreement for fear their children might be adversely impacted if they did otherwise; people who, as children, were forced to attend schools many miles away while their neighbourhood friends attended the school across the road, which would not accept them because they were the wrong religion; parents who are now forced into the same segregationist situation with their own children, putting them on a school bus in the morning for a trip of perhaps 45 minutes or more because the school across the street, where all their neighbourhood friends go, will not accept them on religious grounds, and because there is no room left for them at the bottom of the ...

Both of them expressed unequivocal support for Mr. Justice Binnie's conclusions”, is “several” used to mean “more than two but not many” as defined by the Canadian Oxford Dictionary (2 ed) and (i) if so, who other than Justice Charron and Prof. Hogg is included in the class of “eminently qualified individuals” who reviewed this opinion, (ii) if not, in what sense was the word " several" used in this context and to convey what; (hh) was Justice Binnie informed that his opinion would be made public and, if so, was this part of the arrangement the government made with him; (ii) can Justice Charron publicly release her opinion that was rendered to the government and, if not, why not; (jj) can Professor Hogg publicly release his opinion that ...[+++] was rendered to the government and, if not, why not; (kk) will the government release the opinions of Justice Charron and Prof. Hogg and, if not, why not; (ll) how did the government decide from whom to seek opinions; (mm) how did the government determine whose opinions to release; (nn) other than the Minister of Justice, who in the Department of Justice, in the Prime Minister's Office, and in the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada reviewed the Charron and Hogg opinions; (oo) where are the Charron and Hogg opinions currently stored, who has access to them, and what is the plan for retention; (pp) concerning the Selection Panel that considered Justice Marc Nadon’s candidacy, (i) how were members of the Panel chosen, (ii) what qualifications were sought, (iii) how did each of the members of the Panel meet the qualifications in (ii), (iv) what measures are in place to ensure that Aboriginal candidates are considered in the work of the Panel; (qq) who was the Executive Director of the SCC Selection Committee for this process and how was this person selected; (rr) what protections were in place to ensure that members of the Panel elevated mid-summer to Cabinet were not influenced by their ...

All the constitutional experts who were consulted, even those who gave their opinion without being consulted by the government directly, said that there was no basis for the position adopted by the court in the end, and their perspective was similar to the dissenting opinion of Justice Moldaver, the constitutional expert, Mr. Hogg, and former Justice Binnie, who, along with others, issued opinions that were published.

Finally, the Handbook underlines that, when taking measures to tackle potential abuse, national authorities must not subject the persons concerned to degrading treatment nor discriminate on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, nationality, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation ...[+++], as such measures would violate, respectively, Article 4 of the Charter (and Article 3 of the Convention) and Article 21 of the Charter (and possibly Article 14 of the Convention as well).