Traduction de «reverse reverse » (Anglais → Français) :

6. The central administrator shall ensure that the Union Registry accepts the proposal for reversal made pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 4, blocks the units that are to be transferred by the reversal and forwards the proposal to the central administrator provided that all of the following conditions are met:

The question in my mind is this: Although I understand there are many statutes where a principle of reverse onus is applied from a public policy standpoint, where my objective in public policy is to ensure the minimum impairment of human rights, has there been a growth of application of this reverse onus principle in all kinds of statutes that are arriving before legislators, whether at the provincial or the federal level in our country, so much so that it almost goes unchallenged?

(Return tabled) Question No. 52 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With regard to Enbridge’s Line 9 reversal project (Line 9 Phase l Reversal Project and Line 9B Reversal and Capacity Expansion Project): (a) what are the results of all government reports, details of briefing notes, or meeting summaries that were produced between January 1, 2011, to June 1, 2013; (b) what studies, analyses or assessments did the government undertake to determine the safety of the project, (i) what are the dates of all studies, analyses, and assessments, (ii) what are the results of each; (c) what are the details of the studies, reports, briefing notes, or meeting summaries that the government has produced regarding the economic and environmental impacts and, what are (i) ...[+++]the results associated with each, (ii) the costs associated with each; (d) what studies, reports, briefing notes, or meeting summaries has the government undertaken regarding greenhouse gas emissions if the Line 9 pipeline was reversed and filled with diluted bitumen, (i) what were the results of these studies, (ii) how are emissions expected to impact Canada’s ability to achieve its climate commitments; (e) what are the dates of any correspondence between the government or the Minister of Natural Resources or the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Portland Montreal Pipeline Company, and what are the key points for each correspondence; (f) what are the dates of any correspondence between the Minister of Natural Resources and the National Energy Board regarding the hearing process and applications for participation and intervener status; (g) did the Minister of Natural Resources have a role to play in the National Energy Board changing its approach to public participation in hearings, particularly those concerning the proposal to reverse and expand Line 9 and, if so, what was that role; and (h) what effect have the changes adopted in the government’s 2012 budget bills had on the Line 9 review process to date?

This fundamental condition on reverse onus forfeiture, in addition to the scope of offences, further helps to support the presumption that the offender's property is the proceeds of crime and thus supports the application of reverse onus forfeiture.

welcomes the production of the Communication of the Commission to the Council on the need to develop an anti tax-fraud strategy and takes note of the oral report by the Commission on the technical work done regarding the application of a reverse charge system in the VAT area; stresses the need for further action to combat actively fraud and most specifically VAT fraud; recognises that all kind of possible improvements should be considered and recalls the good experiences Member States have already made with the application of reverse charge in limited areas; in the light of the results of the technical group further analysis of a more ...[+++] generalised reverse charge is therefore necessary; will examine all the issues raised by the fraud communication, including possible legal changes to the VAT system, continue more specifically and with the help of the Commission the analysis of the use of the reverse charge as a mechanism for dealing with VAT fraud; prepare the elements that the Council would see being necessary components for a global anti-fraud strategy, come back by its last meeting in 2006 in order to allow the provision of guidance for further work to the Commission".

However, since the government did not introduce meaningful changes to the running rights provisions, this committee must amend Bill C-26 to adopt case-by-case reverse onus running rights based on the following principles: any person may apply to the agency for the right to solicit and carry traffic located on the track served by another railway; reverse onus, where the railway may prove the application is not in the public interest; and access fees based on the host railway's cost of providing service plus a reasonable rate of return.