Traduction de «suppléante du parquet général » (Français → Anglais) :

The European Chief Prosecutor is fully accountable for the performance of his/her duties as the head of the EPPO and as such he/she bears an overall institutional accountability for its general activities to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.

3. Reaffirms its strong willingness to establish an EPPO and to reform Eurojust as foreseen by the Commission in its proposal for a regulation on Eurojust; is convinced, however, that the Eurojust reform should be put on hold until the Council has adopted a general approach regarding the EPPO; sticks to the package approach, because of the close interaction of EPPO and Eurojust;

7. Emphasises that the structure of the EPPO should be fully independent of national governments and the EU institutions and protected from political influence and pressure; calls, therefore, for openness, objectiveness and transparency in the selection and appointment procedures for the European Chief Prosecutor, his/her deputies, the European Prosecutors and the European Delegated Prosecutors; believes that in order to prevent any conflicts of interests, the position of European Prosecutor should be a full‑time position;

(46) The general rules of transparency applicable to Union agencies should also apply to the European Public Prosecutor’s Office; administrative inquiries conducted by the European Ombudsman should respect the requirement of confidentiality of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office.

5. Considers the procedure for appointing the EPPO, as set out in the Commission proposal, to be undemocratic and opaque; demands that Parliament be given a more central role in the appointment procedure and, in particular, that it be given the right to appoint half the members of the selection panel responsible for drawing up the shortlist of candidates; points out that, in order to ensure his or her independence, the chief prosecutor should be appointed by common accord between Parliament and the Council; suggests that a formal procedure for the dismissal of the EPPO be included in the EPPO regulation; considers, in this regard, th ...[+++]e provisions currently set out in Article 8 of the Commission proposal to be insufficient;

(46) The general rules of transparency applicable to Union agencies should also apply to the European Public Prosecutor’s Office but only with regard to its administrative tasks so as not to jeopardise in any manner the requirement of confidentiality in its operational work.