Traduction de «Administration sector » (Anglais → Français) :

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

economic sector

farming sector [ agricultural sector | agriculture | Agricultural sector(ECLAS) ]

administrative formalities [ administrative burden | administrative cost | administrative simplification | bureaucracy | cost of administration | cost of administrative formalities | simplification of administrative formalities | Bureaucracy(STW) | bureaucracy(UNBIS) ]

extractive sector strategies | mining sector protocols | mining sector guidelines | mining sector policies

shipping sector guidelines | transportation sector regulations | transportation sector policies | transportation sector protocols

energy sector protocols | power sector strategies | energy sector policies | power sector protocols

Sector for Administration and Finances | Administration and Finances Sector

fetal distress in labour or delivery due to drug administration

maternal complications arising from the administration of a general or local anaesthetic, analgesic or other sedation during pregnancy

Administrative burdens: sectoral reduction plans 2009

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - et0003 - EN - Administrative burdens: sectoral reduction plans 2009

Promoting good governance, reforming the judiciary, rule of law, anti-corruption, anti-money-laundering and anti-fraud activities Improving revenue administration, public financial management and the management of public assets Modernising public administration and tax administration including fighting tax evasion; Improving the business and investment climate; Reforms related to energy and climate; Reforms related to education; Labour and social policies including making the healthcare sector more efficient and encouraging more s ...[+++]ocial inclusion; Financial sector and access to finance, reforms related to the capital markets union; Managing migration and border control.

(Return tabled) Question No. 990 Hon. Mauril Bélanger: With regard to the Interchange Canada Program: (a) how many temporary assignments of core public administration employees were there to other public, not-for-profit or private sector organizations, and what were the program’s recipient organizations and the number of employees by organization for the years (i) 2007, (ii) 2008, (iii) 2009, (iv) 2010, (v) 2011; and (b) how many temporary assignments of employees of public (other than core public administration), private and not-for ...[+++]-profit sector organizations were there, and what were the program’s core public administration recipient organizations and the number of employees by organization for the years (i) 2007, (ii) 2008, (iii) 2009, (iv) 2010, (v) 2011?