Traduction de «Aerial to medium loss » (Anglais → Français) :

It talks about the use of medium helicopter lift capacity and unmanned aerial vehicles for aerial surveillance.

Second, that the government secure medium helicopter lift capacity and high performance unmanned aerial vehicles. We believe this is a reasonable compromise that addresses the important questions Canadians have about future of the mission and it will give our brave men and women the means to succeed.

While my Liberal colleagues and I remain hopeful that many of these concerns will be addressed in the new motion put forward by the Conservatives, what we are looking for now is a firm commitment from the Conservative government to support the following three conditions of the Liberal amendment: one, the Government of Canada must immediately notify NATO that Canada will end its military presence in Kandahar as of February 1, 2011 and, as of that date, the deployment of Canadian Forces troops out of Kandahar will start as soon as possible so that it will be completed by July 1, 2011; two, NATO must ensure troops to rotate into Kandahar to allow C ...[+++]anadian troops to be deployed pursuant to the mission priorities of training and reconstruction; and three, the government must secure medium helicopter lift and high performance, unmanned aerial vehicles.

Yesterday, the Prime Minister stated that the medium lift helicopters and the unmanned aerial drones were already on order.

This provision reflects the assumption that a company experiencing a massive loss in its registered capital will be unable to stem losses that will almost certainly condemn it to go out of business in the short or medium term.

In the medium to long term, the planned result before tax in 2006 of EUR [...]** (according to the revised medium‐term plan and on the basis of the above three measures) would fall by about EUR [...]** to just under EUR [...]**, [...]** of this amount on account of the loss of Berliner Bank’s income to the group and the remainder on account of the delays in staff cutbacks, the loss of the planned increase in fee income and remaining (fixed) costs (especially in the context of back‐office diseconomies of scale).