Traduction de «Assess artistic proposal » (Anglais → Français) :

assessing the artistic proposal | identify the proposal | assess artistic proposal | evaluate the proposed project

assess team's artistic progress | monitor progress in the artistic team | assess artistic team progress | assess progress with the artistic team

propose project to artist | suggest projects to artist | propose projects to artist | recommend projects to artist

artist call-out | call for artists | call for artist submissions | call for artist proposals | call for entries | call for submissions | open call for submissions

assessment of an investment proposal [ investment proposal assessment ]

A Guide to Environmental Assessments: Assessing Proposed Projects

Working Group for the Assessment of New Commission Proposals | BNC [Abbr.]

Akwé: Kon Voluntary Guidelines | Akwé: Kon Voluntary Guidelines for the Conduct of Cultural, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment regarding Developments Proposed to Take Place on, or which are Likely to Impact on, Sacred Sites and on Lands and Waters Traditionally Occupied or Used by Indigenous and Local Communities

Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals

22. Stresses that copyright is an important economic basis for creativity, employment and innovation, as well as the guarantor of cultural diversity, and that it is essential to enable Europe’s creative and cultural industries to compete on a global scale; stresses that further efforts are needed in the field of copyright to strike a balance between all key actors, and that any revision of copyright law should ensure adequate protection that fosters investment and growth in the creative and cultural sector, whilst removing legal uncertainties and inconsistencies that adversely affect the functioning of the Digital Single Market (DSM); urges the Commission to review, where necessary, the regulatory framework for copyright in order to achie ...[+++]ve a better access to creative content for European citizens, and to stimulate European researchers, educational establishments, cultural heritage institutions and the creative sector to adapt their activities to the digital world; underlines that appropriate remuneration must be paid by those who profit from the exploitation of copyright-protected works, and that any solutions in this regard should not discourage the use of legal providers; recalls that digital technologies have redefined the value chain in the cultural sector, mostly to the benefit of intermediaries and often to the detriment of creators; asks the Commission to investigate the extent and impact of such changes and to propose measures to improve the remuneration of authors and artists at European level; stresses that any revised provisions should be future-proof and technologically neutral, evidence based and carefully assessed in line with the Commission’s objective of better regulation, while taking into account the differences between the digital and analogical environments;

We actually proposed that the Copyright Board would set a rate that would be good for the artist and fair for the consumer and to have that independent assessment done.

As in previous years with the pilot project of the same name, the Commission gathered a group of independent experts to examine the artistic and cultural quality of the different projects, and to assess their accordance with the selection criteria contained in the call for proposals published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, C114 of 19 April 1996.