Traduction de «Branching program » (Anglais → Français) :

branching program [ branching programme | Crowderian programme | Crowderian program ]

Programs Branch [ Programs, Policy and Planning Branch ]

Priorities and Program Co-ordination Branch [ Programs and Procedures Branch ]

program branches | programme branches

branch and bound data driven program

oversee recycling program budget | supervise recycling program budget | manage recycling program budget | manage recycling program budgets

evaluate broadcast program | gauge broadcast programs | evaluate broadcast programs | evaluating broadcast programs

manage programming | supervise programming | monitor programming | monitoring programming

software [ computer programme | computer programming | software development | software engineering | software industry | software package | computer programs(UNBIS) | software engineering(UNBIS) ]

Chief of an overseas Tangun Trading Corporation branch, which is primarily responsible for the procurement of commodities and technologies to support the DPRK's defence research and development programs.

Witness(es): From the Treasury Board Secretariat: Diana Monnet, Assistant Secretary, Official Languages Branch; Joseph Riccardi, Senior Program Officer, Official Languages Branch, Policy and Products; Gérald Groulx, Program Officer, Official Languages Branch, Programs and Liaison; Anne Boudreault, Counsel, Legal Services Branch.

3. Welcomes the opening of negotiations for a new interinstitutional agreement on better law making; takes the view that this should lead to improvements in the quality of the Commission’s legislative drafting, the strengthening of its impact assessment of draft laws, including economic, social, environmental and SME-related impact assessments and, where appropriate, the use of regulations rather than directives in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; expects the Commission to treat the two branches of the legislative authority equally in terms of the information and documentation provided throughout the ...[+++]legislative process; expects stronger commitment to ensuring proper interinstitutional consultation, a full follow-up to Parliament’s proposals and recommendations, and the provision of detailed justifications for each envisaged withdrawal; recalls that the multiannual programming, agreed between the three institutions, should provide the framework for the annual work programme and should form the basis of discussions on the specific annual work programme; recalls its view that better law making should not be seen as a tool for deprioritising areas falling within EU competences and that political decisions within the democratic decision-making process should prevail over technical assessments;

3. Welcomes the opening of negotiations for a new interinstitutional agreement on better law making; takes the view that this should lead to improvements in the quality of the Commission’s legislative drafting, the strengthening of its impact assessment of draft laws, including economic, social, environmental and SME-related impact assessments and, where appropriate, the use of regulations rather than directives in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; expects the Commission to treat the two branches of the legislative authority equally in terms of the information and documentation provided throughout the ...[+++]legislative process; expects stronger commitment to ensuring proper interinstitutional consultation, a full follow-up to Parliament’s proposals and recommendations, and the provision of detailed justifications for each envisaged withdrawal; recalls that the multiannual programming, agreed between the three institutions, should provide the framework for the annual work programme and should form the basis of discussions on the specific annual work programme; recalls its view that better law making should not be seen as a tool for deprioritising areas falling within EU competences and that political decisions within the democratic decision-making process should prevail over technical assessments;