Traduction de «Computer operation report » (Anglais → Français) :

The computer system must also contain documents and information of common interest such as the operational programme (Annex I, part A), the Commission decision concerning the contribution of the EFF, the annual and final reports on implementation (model Annex XIV), the audit strategy (Annex V) and a description of the management system (Annex XII, part A).

Q-240 — Mr. Jaffer (Edmonton—Strathcona) — With regard to ports of entry into Canada: (a) what are the standards used by all customs officers across Canada to determine a high-risk traveller or shipment, and what is the standard procedure as to what to do with such a traveller or shipment once it is determined to be high-risk; (b) under what standard procedure are customs officers expected to refer travellers to immigration officers, and is there any standard for immigration officers to notify customs officers as to the results of such referrals; if it is determined that a traveller should be referred to an Immigration officer and there is no immigration officer at that location, what is the standard procedure that a customs officer shoul ...[+++]d follow; (c) why are there no joint Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA) evaluations planned to determine the effectiveness of customs officers and immigration officers at the border; (d) is there a standard for the sharing of data and intelligence between customs officers and immigration officers; (e) is there a standard referral procedure by which customs officers can clearly determine by which points should a traveller be referred to immigration officers; (f) is there an agreement between the CCRA and CIC that would provide for periodic evaluations to be performed jointly by CCRA and CIC to determine the effectiveness of their joint operations; (g) what percentage of the time does the Primary Automated Lookout System-Highway equipment correctly read licence plates of vehicles stopped at border crossing booths; (h) what facilities exist for examining commercial shipments at the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor and where are they located in relation to the bridge customs site: (i) what is the standard procedure for ensuring that truck operators told to report to the facility actually arrive there; and (ii) under what circumstances would procedures dictate that a truck be escort ...

(Return tabled) Question No. 240 Mr. Rahim Jaffer: With regard to ports of entry into Canada: (a) what are the standards used by all customs officers across Canada to determine a high-risk traveller or shipment, and what is the standard procedure as to what to do with such a traveller or shipment once it is determined to be high-risk; (b) under what standard procedure are customs officers expected to refer travellers to immigration officers, and is there any standard for immigration officers to notify customs officers as to the results of such referrals; if it is determined that a traveller should be referred to an Immigration officer and there is no immigration officer at that location, what is the standard procedure that a customs offic ...[+++]er should follow; (c) why are there no joint Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA) evaluations planned to determine the effectiveness of customs officers and immigration officers at the border; (d) is there a standard for the sharing of data and intelligence between customs officers and immigration officers; (e) is there a standard referral procedure by which customs officers can clearly determine by which points should a traveller be referred to immigration officers; (f) is there an agreement between the CCRA and CIC that would provide for periodic evaluations to be performed jointly by CCRA and CIC to determine the effectiveness of their joint operations; (g) what percentage of the time does the Primary Automated Lookout System-Highway equipment correctly read licence plates of vehicles stopped at border crossing booths; (h) what facilities exist for examining commercial shipments at the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor and where are they located in relation to the bridge customs site: (i) what is the standard procedure for ensuring that truck operators told to report to the facility actually arrive there; and (ii) under what circumstances would procedures dictate that a truck b ...

Member States would moreover have to send to the Commission by computer transmission before 15 March for the period from 1 July to 31 December of the preceding year and before 15 September for the period from 1 January to 30 June of the current year, a report on the operation of the programmes.

Specifically, urgent action is advocated to: Accelerate preparations in public administrations, particularly at local and regional level; establish mechanisms for the co-ordination and monitoring of public sector progress; develop sound contingency plans to ensure the business continuity of vital public sector and infrastructure operations; encourage the active participation of industry sectors in international Year 2000 Computing initiatives, especially external testing; monitor and report ...[+++] upon the readiness of the energy and transport sectors; focus on providing information to and protecting the rights of consumers; facilitate greater co-operation within and between industrial sectors, and between private and public sectors; improve information disclosure about the ability to deal with the year 2000 problem of products, services and organisations; Adopt the use of common reporting templates to form part of a country-wide strategy for communicating readiness, tracking progress, and promoting public confidence.

Conclusions At the end of this first evaluation and analysis exercise concerning resources for the monitoring of the fishing industry, the Commission takes the view that it must in future give priority to the following: - validation of the information transmitted by each Member State on resources devoted to control work and the outcome of this work; - new areas being covered by control work at Community level (in particular structural policy, market monitoring, possibility of checks during transport, and the development of systematic cross-checks between different sources of information); - the problems in each fishery that lie behind major infringements of Community regulations to the possible detriment of other Member States (e.g. quota ...[+++] overruns in the North and Baltic Seas and disregard of technical conservation rules in Region 3); - coordination between national administrations and between them and the Commission departments, particularly through accelerated implementation of new technology (satellite monitoring, computer links, etc.), plus coordination of action at sea (e.g. in the Atlantic tuna fisheries, checks on catches by vessels operating in the EEZ of one Member State and landing at a port in another,etc.) To sum up, the report stresses the role to be played by the Commission in the process of coordination in order to improve synergy and dispel suspicion between the various interests involved.