Traduction de «Direct response » (Anglais → Français) :

direct response card | reply postcard | reply-paid postcard

Direct Response Receipt Card

direct-response advertising | direct response | direct-response promotion

direct-response advertising | direct response advertising | direct advertising

directional radio pattern | directional response pattern

direct-response advertising [ direct advertising ]

direct marketing | direct response marketing

directional response

Canadian Association of Direct Response Insurers

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

Does Article 1[(1)](b) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC (1) of 12 March 2001, in conjunction with Article 4(1) thereof, preclude an interpretation of the Spanish legislation intended to give effect to the Directive, to the effect that a public-sector undertaking, responsible for a service central to its own activities and requiring important material resources, that has been providing that service by means of a public contract, requiring the contractor to use those resources which it owns, is not subject to the obligation to take over ...[+++]the rights and obligations relating to employment relationships when it decides not to extend the contract but to assume direct responsibility for its performance, using its own staff and thereby excluding the staff employed by the contractor, so that the service continues to be provided without any change other than that arising as a result of the replacement of the workers performing the activities and the fact that they are employed by a different employer?

Although I do not have direct responsibility for other agencies that have a direct responsibility under the Official Languages Act, such CATSA, the Canada Border Services Agency and Air Canada, we meet with them to remind them of their responsibilities in that regard, but it is their responsibility.

The ethics of ministers is the direct responsibility of the Prime Minister and I believe it should be his direct responsibility.

I believe it is fair to say, though — and I have colleagues in the chamber on both sides who served on the committee — that the consensus around legislative oversight was that ministerial accountability, in terms of the direct chain of command, is insufficient in a parliamentary democracy; that the premise of a parliamentary democracy is that while operational decisions have to be made on occasion in secret, and the people who have direct responsibility at the ministerial level, and the appropriate clearance, have to be aware of thos ...[+++]e decisions, and I would argue as the honourable senator does, that responsibility should not be a post-factum reality, but ministers have the right to be aware in advance and to exercise ministerial responsibility in that respect.