Traduction de «En bloc value » (Anglais → Français) :

archival value [ historical value | continuing value | enduring value | secondary value | long-term value | permanent value | indefinite value | lasting value | research value | evidential-archival value ]

exploitable value | exploitation value | liquidation value | realisation value | realization value | utilization value

gross calorific value [ GCV | high heating value | gross heating value | higher calorific value | gross energy value | higher heating value | upper heating value | gross specific energy | upper calorific value ]

value to the firm | deprival value | entity value | entity-specific value | opportunity value | retention value | value to the business

low calorific value | low heat value | lower heating value | net calorific value | net heating value | net specific energy | LHV [Abbr.] | NCV [Abbr.]

gross calorific value | gross heating value | high heat value | high heating value | higher heating value | GCV [Abbr.] | HHV [Abbr.]

company's value | enterprise's value | value of company culture | value of enterprise culture | entrepreneurial culture value

establish resale value of items | estimate resale value of items | determine resale value of items | determine value of used items

to keep in mind the strategic importance of the EU-US economic relationship in general and of TTIP in particular, inter alia as an opportunity to promote the principles and values, anchored in a rules-based framework, that the EU and the US share and cherish and to design a common approach and vision to global trade, investment and trade-related issues such as high standards, norms and regulations, in order to develop a broader transatlantic vision and a common set of strategic goals; to bear in mind that given the size of the transatlantic market, TTIP is an opportunity to shape and regulate the international trade order in order to ensure ...[+++]that both blocs thrive in an interconnected world;

B. whereas the EU’s GDP is heavily dependent on trade and export and benefits from trade and investment based on rules and whereas an ambitious and balanced agreement with the US should support the reindustrialisation of Europe and help to achieve the 2020 target for an increase in the EU’s GDP generated by industry from 15 % to 20 % by strengthening trans-atlantic trade in both goods and services; whereas it has the potential to create opportunities especially for SMEs, micro enterprises (in accordance with the definition of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC), clusters and enterprise networks which suffer disproportionally more from non-tariff barriers (NTBs) than larger companies, as the latter have economies of scale that allow the ...[+++]m easier access to markets on both sides of the Atlantic; whereas an agreement between the two biggest economic blocs in the world has the potential to create standards, norms and rules, which will be adopted at a global level, which would serve to the advantage of third countries as well and which would prevent a further fragmentation of world trade; whereas failure to negotiate an agreement will allow other third countries with different standards and values to assume this role instead;

Question No. 175 Mr. Peter Julian: With regard to public subsidies to federal political parties and political contributions: (a) what was the total value given for calendar year 2010 as a part of the so-called “per vote subsidy” (also sometimes referred to as the " government allowance" ) to the (i) Conservative Party of Canada, (ii) New Democratic Party of Canada, (iii) Liberal Party of Canada, (iv) Green Party of Canada, (v) Bloc Québécois; (b) what was the total value given following the 2008 general election under the electoral e ...[+++]xpense reimbursement (also sometimes referred to as " government rebates" , " government transfers" , or " election rebates" ) including both the total national expense reimbursements received and the total riding expense reimbursements received to the (i) Conservative Party of Canada and candidates, (ii) New Democratic Party of Canada and candidates, (iii) Liberal Party of Canada and candidates, (iv) Green Party of Canada and candidates, (v) Bloc Québécois and candidates; (c) what was the total value given in calendar year 2010 via the personal income tax credit subsidy of political contributions as per the Income Tax Act to the (i) Conservative Party of Canada donors, (ii) New Democratic Party of Canada donors, (iii) Liberal Party of Canada donors, (iv) Green Party of Canada donors, (v) Bloc Québécois donors; (d) what percentage of the total amount paid out via the “per vote subsidy” went to the Conservative Party of Canada compared to all other registered political parties; (e) what percentage of the total amount paid out via the electoral expense reimbursements went to the Conservative Party of Canada and candidates thereof compared to all other registered political parties and candidates thereof; (f) what percentage of the total amount paid out via the personal income tax credit subsidy of political contributions went to Conservative Party of Canada donors compared to donors to all other ...

As always, the Bloc Québécois studied the motion very carefully, and we concluded that it respects the values upheld by our party, the values of Quebeckers, and that it calls for compassion in particular.